Re: [asterisk-biz] comepletely off topic political stuff

2009-01-07 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Pedram M wrote: As much as I agree, however I still do believe business and politics are very closely tied together in the world we live in today... :) Well, may be you are a communist? :)) Politics is the most concentrated expression of economics (c) V. I. Lenin Regards, Pedram On Wed,

Re: [asterisk-biz] proper analog behavior using an ATA

2008-10-08 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
with this model? Should I forget it and go to the spa2102 for total success? Has the spa2102 passed caller id to analog phones for you? Thanks, Jim - Original Message - From: Sergey Tamkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion asterisk-biz

Re: [asterisk-biz] proper analog behavior using an ATA

2008-10-07 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Jim Houser wrote: Thanks for allowing me to rant, (fighting with a Linksys PAP2T on a home office Asterisk switch right now). Jim Personally I prefer to use linksys SPA2102, i have a pretty big experience with this device. It works good for me and has a lot of settings for tuning. The

Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?

2008-08-04 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Steve Totaro wrote: On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote: Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve. I think that thread was mostly done anyway :) No way, I still don't

Re: [asterisk-biz] Implementation of Video Conferencing using Asterisk

2008-05-19 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Usually, video conferencing hardware (Sony, Tandberg) doesn't use multicast for conferencing itself. Unicast only. Steve Totaro wrote: http://www.vmukti.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=57Itemid=66 Does this not do multicast? I cannot find it in the docs but if it does along

Re: [asterisk-biz] Implementation of Video Conferencing using Asterisk

2008-05-19 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:11 +0400, Sergey Tamkovich wrote: Usually, video conferencing hardware (Sony, Tandberg) doesn't use multicast for conferencing itself. Unicast only. to a point that is required if you have a central server that muxes

Re: [asterisk-biz] DID to Pass CLI

2008-05-16 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
This is different situation, your mobile operator doesn't use 3rd party dids. They use numbers which doesn't interfere with your local dialplan, it's like 192.168.0.0/16 in your own ip network - you can host any service on these addresses, but it won't be available on the public network.

Re: [asterisk-biz] DID to Pass CLI

2008-05-10 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can a DID pass CLI + PIN, For eg: User Dials the DID and a 5 digit PIN 00123456789#1 or 001234567891 and it is accepted as the CLI ( calling number of the person+ #1) in Asterisk. Yes it is possible (sometimes) for example if you are connecting to

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk - SIP - H323 - IAX

2008-03-20 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
chan_h323 looks pretty good for me. It has some bugs though, We are working on issue http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9299 we have some progress there http://voipsolutions.ru/asterisk_segfault_in_chan_h323_under_heavy_load_20080226 I suppose it would be fixed very soon. Dovid Bender wrote:

Re: [asterisk-biz] Russia Termination

2008-02-20 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
:00) (well, you can call that one continuous peak :) ) Douglas Garstang wrote: MSD.. is that Moscow time? 5pm sure sounds like local peak... - Original Message From: Sergey Tamkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion asterisk-biz

Re: [asterisk-biz] Russia Termination

2008-02-19 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
6am PST is 17:00 MSD, it is definitely not the peak hour. We can provide high quality termination at very low rates. H.323 and SIP, T.38, G.729, ulaw/alaw. 1/1 billing Contact me off list if you are interested, Best Regards! Douglas Garstang wrote: We're placing a lot of calls to Russia

Re: [asterisk-biz] hdwr v. sftwr v. no echo cancellation

2008-02-05 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Matt wrote: DEFINITELY use hardware echo canc... otherwise you may be upset with the quality of some calls. OSLEC looks very promising. On Feb 5, 2008 1:22 PM, John Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, As we bring up * and migrate from the

Re: [asterisk-biz] hdwr v. sftwr v. no echo cancellation

2008-02-05 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Mark wrote: Definitely buy hardware echo cancellation, the time and credibility savings are worth the cost. Yeah yeah, i've heard the same about Asterisk vs CCM - 4 years ago. Mark On Feb 6, 2008 7:21 AM, Sergey Tamkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk Business Edition

2008-02-04 Thread Sergey Tamkovich
Is it true that ABE supports Dialogic boards? If yes, what else ABE supports what normal Asterisk doesn't? Jared Smith wrote: On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 11:00 +0700, Dome Charoenyost wrote: I found Asterisk Business Edition supports up to 40 simultaneous calls with upgrades to 240 calls