Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
The gpl states that if you display a copyright you must state that the
program is GPLed (if it so infact is) and that there is no warrantee
(unless there is infact a warantee).
my_shell_prompt# asterisk -r
Asterisk
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of
this software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed by the
University of California, Berkeley and its contributors.
Any
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 08:50 -0700, Jason Becker wrote:
I don't think the above is a *requirement*. I think the above is more of
a guideline. The above is discussed under the section How to Apply
These Terms to Your New Programs with language that strongly
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 11:08 -0500, Iain Barker wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of
this software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed by the
University of
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:13 -0700, Jason Becker wrote:
So you are *modifying* and distributing Asterisk?
Regards,
Yup there are a few things that need to be fixed for me to put my name
anywhere near it.
--
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
That may be however when others get involved, like netbsd that may not
be the case. And anyone can take a BSD license and keep that clause.
Without hearing that from the current holders I wouldnt want to risk it.
So the NetBSD part may
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:41 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
That may be however when others get involved, like netbsd that may not
be the case. And anyone can take a BSD license and keep that clause.
Without hearing that from the
I was looking in the code and became concerned with the state of
asterisk using software without complying to the various licenses
invovled. I was wondering if anyone had any documentation on all the
changes that are required so I can distribute it legally.
For example there is code taken from
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
For example there is code taken from NetBSD as well as the Regents of
California and it is required that credit be given. Specifically their
license states in part:
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:41 -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
For example there is code taken from NetBSD as well as the Regents of
California and it is required that credit be given. Specifically their
license states in part:
* 2. Redistributions in
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:38 -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
But there are other issues as well for example, section um 1? of the gpl
requires that when a copyright is displayed (like when you do 'asterisk
-r') you state that its GPL licensed (although not all of asterisk is so
licensed,
11 matches
Mail list logo
