Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
>>
>>> Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
>>>
>>>
>> I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
>>
>
>
riday, August 01, 2008 1:56 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:32 PM, C. Savinovich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>If you are questi
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
>> Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
>>
>
> I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
No way, I still don't have partners to work with ;)
>
>
>> T
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
> Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
>
I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
> Thanks for the help Trixter, and feeling pretty dumb that the stuff is
> straight on google, a lot of the times I can't seem to find telecom stuff.
er... sorry about that I meant to say thanks Steve, and sorry for
hijacking your thread. I thought I was replying to trixter.
Anyway, I stop the hijack now. Apologies.
Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey Trixter,
>>
>> Can you explain a bi
Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
Thanks for the help Trixter, and feeling pretty dumb that the stuff is
straight on google, a lot of the times I can't seem to find telecom stuff.
Regards,
Igor H.
Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:42 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Trixter,
> >
> > Can you explain a bit more about the "early media" adverts and why there
> > aren't any per minute charges?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Igor H.
> >
>
> Try
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:32 PM, C. Savinovich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>If you are questioning ethics, then state it.
>
> You are saying that my question/s are implying that there are questionable
> ethics on your uniquely fantastic and terrific idea? That's too funny... I
> tell you, I am r
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Trixter,
>
> Can you explain a bit more about the "early media" adverts and why there
> aren't any per minute charges?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Igor H.
>
Try the first or second hits on Google.
http://www.jdrosen.net/sip_early.html
http
Hey Trixter,
Can you explain a bit more about the "early media" adverts and why there
aren't any per minute charges?
Thanks,
Igor H.
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:38 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
>> I was basing it on some of the explanatory pages on the FCC site, n
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:38 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
> I was basing it on some of the explanatory pages on the FCC site, not
> the underlying orders. (Of course, when I did a web search to try to
> find a reference to reply to Steve, I couldn't find the pages.)
>
> I'm 99.9% sure a couple
Regarding questioning of ethics, the post certainly could have been
interpreted as such, and I attest that I drew the same inference,
although I don't recall an overt accusation. So roar with laughter at me
too. I reread it to figure out how I got that impression, and found this...
Are they g
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> I am curious, was the order that I mentioned the one you were thinking
> of (basically numbers themselves shouldnt be commodities, "cherry"
> tollfrees shouldnt have a premium price on them, etc) or was there a
> different order that you were thinking of?
>
I was
fer?
>
>
>
> Nigel Dennis
>
>
> From: "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
> Discussion
> To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
> Discuss
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:04 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
> Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> > Unless there is another order that you were thinking of I dont think
> > what steve is trying to do (forward calls off it) is covered by this
> > one. The article even goes into a "sharing" thing where
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> Unless there is another order that you were thinking of I dont think
> what steve is trying to do (forward calls off it) is covered by this
> one. The article even goes into a "sharing" thing where 1 memorable
> tollfree routes to multiple companies, highly simila
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 12:32 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
> Steve Totaro wrote:
> > Anyways, I am up for bids. The number is very memorable and to clear
> > things up, my number is 888, their number is 800, but someone messed
> > up and pucblished my number.
> >
>
> IANAL, but my understanding i
21 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
>
> Your question not is too difficult, or too rhetorical. If you are
> questioning ethics, then state
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Richard Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Totaro wrote:
>> Anyways, I am up for bids. The number is very memorable and to clear
>> things up, my number is 888, their number is 800, but someone messed
>> up and pucblished my number.
>>
>
> IANAL, but my un
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 6:27 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
&g
Steve Totaro wrote:
> Anyways, I am up for bids. The number is very memorable and to clear
> things up, my number is 888, their number is 800, but someone messed
> up and pucblished my number.
>
IANAL, but my understanding is that speculation on toll-free numbers is
prohibited by the FCC.
There
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 6:27 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
>
> The mo
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:47 AM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
> The mobile carrier has published my very similar number by mistake in
> their contact information somewhere. There would be no deception.
> Just offerings that may match the demographic. People that for
> whatever reason are delinquent on their bills.
>
; Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:47 AM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
>
> I have thought this out a bit. The number is a toll free 888 vanity
> that
nesday, July 30, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
I have thought this out a bit. The number is a toll free 888 vanity
that I paid for because it is so memo
gt; To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
> Discussion"
> Subject: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
> CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:02 -0400
>>I have a phone number that has erroneously been published
mmercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"Subject: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:02 -0400>I have a phone number that has erroneously been published by one of>the larger cell phone compani
28 matches
Mail list logo
