Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Michelle Dupuis
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Poirier [mousepa...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 2:25 PM To: Asterisk Business List Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement I disagree totally, unless you're lacking hardware resources

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Steve Poirier
puis > >>Sent: November-21-10 10:54 AM > >>To: Asterisk Business List > >>Subject: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite > version > >>announcement > >> > >>GenerationD is please to announce a Lite version of its High Availab

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Steve Poirier
biz- > >>boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michelle Dupuis > >>Sent: November-21-10 10:54 AM > >>To: Asterisk Business List > >>Subject: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite > version > >>announcement > >> > >>Gen

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Gerald Bove
...@contacttel.com Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:15 PM To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement " There are many ways to provide 5 nines - personally we connect customer

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-25 Thread Brad Watkins
No, that's an experienced, mature cognizance that in the real world things fail. Life-critical military and NASA control systems are often built using similar principles, and the primary systems are still engineered to NEVER fail. But they do, and that's why there are usually three of them. - Br

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-25 Thread lists
ble ? >>-Original Message- >>From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz- >>boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell >>Sent: November-24-10 2:35 PM >>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion >>Subject: R

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-25 Thread lists
33 PM >>To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com >>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version >>announcement >> >>When I was in the Computer field, 99.999% uptime didn't count planned >>downtime for maintenance and such.. >>

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-24 Thread John Ervin
BTW, I am in Telephone Systems support, mostly Nortel systems (824, 308, BCM, CICS, MICS etc) but very interested in VOIP systems. On 11/24/2010 05:39 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: > On 25/11/10 11:32 AM, John Ervin wrote: >> When I was in the Computer field, 99.999% uptime didn't count planned >> down

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-24 Thread John Ervin
It's been a while, but I don't remember IBM Mainframes looking like that. Maybe the DASD Farms but not the computers. On 11/24/2010 05:39 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: > On 25/11/10 11:32 AM, John Ervin wrote: >> When I was in the Computer field, 99.999% uptime didn't count planned >> downtime for main

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-24 Thread Matt Riddell
On 25/11/10 11:32 AM, John Ervin wrote: > When I was in the Computer field, 99.999% uptime didn't count planned > downtime for maintenance and such.. This computer field? http://tinyurl.com/27yzfwo :) I've always considered uptime to be uptime - customer doesn't really care why a machine is do

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-24 Thread John Ervin
When I was in the Computer field, 99.999% uptime didn't count planned downtime for maintenance and such.. On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: > On 22/11/10 4:58 AM, li...@contacttel.com wrote: >> Sorry you can't put Asterisk and failover in same sentence. >> >> Any one who Thinks and sell

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-24 Thread Matt Riddell
On 22/11/10 4:58 AM, li...@contacttel.com wrote: > Sorry you can't put Asterisk and failover in same sentence. > > Any one who Thinks and sells that, is just plain defrauding clients, > > Same goes for those 99.999%uptime guys... that's like under 25 secs downtime > in 30 days... > > Just no way,

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-21 Thread Patrick Lists
On 11/21/2010 04:58 PM, li...@contacttel.com wrote: > > Sorry you can't put Asterisk and failover in same sentence. > > Any one who Thinks and sells that, is just plain defrauding clients, > > Same goes for those 99.999%uptime guys... that's like under 25 secs downtime > in 30 days... > > Just no w

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-21 Thread lists
rom: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz- >>boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michelle Dupuis >>Sent: November-21-10 10:54 AM >>To: Asterisk Business List >>Subject: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version >>announ

[asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-21 Thread Michelle Dupuis
GenerationD is please to announce a Lite version of its High Availability ASTersik product (HAAST). The new lite version is designed for small installations (5 channels max) that want all of the failover and high availability features of larger installations, allowing small companies to use a