Talking of bounties, are there any plans for realtime support for
musiconhold.conf? If not, or if they are slow-moving, Integrics is
willing to offer a bounty to speed things up.
Alistair Cunningham
+1 888 468 3111
+44 20 799 39 799
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://integrics.com/
_
craig,
I'll take that bounty! are you serious?!?
daveC
Craig Lawrence wrote:
I'd like to offer a bounty for decent documentation of Asterisk (user
manual) and Sales & Marketing Docs :-)
$1000
Cheers
Craig Lawrence
___
--Bandwidth and Colocat
I'd like to offer a bounty for decent documentation of Asterisk (user
manual) and Sales & Marketing Docs :-)
$1000
Cheers
Craig Lawrence
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Henry L.Coleman wrote:
> Proponents of the Global
> Economy keep saying that competition is good and raises the standard of
> living for people in poor industrialized countries but it is my contention
> that the rich countries get poorer at this expense.
>
Yes, reducing the gap between rich and
bounties!!!" )
>
> /Danny :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 3 november 2007 01:02
> To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Bounties.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-biz-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Froberg
> Sent: Saturday, 3 November 2007 9:12 AM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Bounties.
>
> Asterisk is however a very very very internationa
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 3 november 2007 01:02
To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Bounties.
>>It's better than letting their children go hungry.
It amounts to taking away work from programmers in the United
>>It's better than letting their children go hungry.
It amounts to taking away work from programmers in the United States.
We technical people in USA, G-D blessed this beautiful country, although
we dont have our children going hungry (as far as I know LOL) we
nevertheless have bills to pay.
ame job for $50, by all means, welcome the offer.
>
>Best regards
>C. Savinovich
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
>Rubenstein
>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:19 PM
>To: Bill Micha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Rubenstein
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:19 PM
To: Bill Michaelson
Cc: Asterisk -Biz
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Bounties.
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 14:09 -0400, Bill Michaelson wrote:
> I do
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 14:09 -0400, Bill Michaelson wrote:
> I don't see why work-for-pay (bounties) are incompatible with
> open-source. As Mr. Rubenstein points out, bounties are cumulative,
> and talent is busy. At least the potential for large sums to be
> offered is there, and they aren't ne
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Bill Michaelson wrote:
> Perhaps if a more formalized or structured process for managing bounties
> was in place, cumulative bounties would grow larger and attract more
> developers.
I would wholeheartedly concur. And yes, your point about cumulative
sums is duly recogn
I don't see why work-for-pay (bounties) are incompatible with
open-source. As Mr. Rubenstein points out, bounties are cumulative, and
talent is busy. At least the potential for large sums to be offered is
there, and they aren't necessarily "half-assed", whatever that really
means. No offer to p
Putting the funds on hold or in an escrow would be ideal.
Thanks,
Steve
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
> This is open source. And an open community. Bounties are not "work for
> hire" fees, where the bounty offerer gets any exclusive rights to what
> the bounty produces.
>
> The bount
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jason Parker wrote:
>
> I have personally, on many occasions, seen somebody request a feature
> which I think is neat/interesting/whatever. I say "I think that's
> great, and I can write that." I do it *for free*, because *I* like the
> idea. If somebody is willing to pay
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 12:49 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>
> > This is open source. And an open community. Bounties are not "work
> > for hire" fees, where the bounty offerer gets any exclusive rights to
> > what the bounty produces.
>
>
>
>
Alex Balashov wrote:
> $50-$100 bounties? Are you guys SERIOUS?
>
> True, some are simple patches and code changes, but...
>
> For a lot of the kind of features you're asking, there needs to be a
> minimum of at least a couple hundred dollars. Most competent developers
> implementing some of
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> This is open source. And an open community. Bounties are not "work
> for hire" fees, where the bounty offerer gets any exclusive rights to
> what the bounty produces.
This is true. I realise there are other incentives. But in that cas
This is open source. And an open community. Bounties are not "work for
hire" fees, where the bounty offerer gets any exclusive rights to what
the bounty produces.
The bounties are *cumulative*: when enough people add to the bounty
that they're subtantial *in total*, then more peo
$50-$100 bounties? Are you guys SERIOUS?
True, some are simple patches and code changes, but...
For a lot of the kind of features you're asking, there needs to be a
minimum of at least a couple hundred dollars. Most competent developers
implementing some of the features you're asking for wou
20 matches
Mail list logo
