Re: [asterisk-biz] Changes of rules on 08x revenue share numbering in the UK

2006-09-18 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:02:05PM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote: > The proposed changes to 0870 outpayments are going to really hurt a > lot of UK companies who rely on this revenue (e.g. to give cheaper > international access to telecoms customers), or as end users have > built up customer lo

Re: [asterisk-biz] Changes of rules on 08x revenue share numbering in the UK

2006-09-18 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 18/09/06, Andy Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 19 Apr 2006, at 13:25, Linus Surguy wrote: > 0870 to be charged at no more than a geographic number (unless a > free to > caller annoucement is made) with corresponding removal from NTS > determination means that interconnect revenue prob

Re: [asterisk-biz] Changes of rules on 08x revenue share numbering in the UK

2006-09-18 Thread Andy Davidson
On 19 Apr 2006, at 13:25, Linus Surguy wrote: 0870 to be charged at no more than a geographic number (unless a free to caller annoucement is made) with corresponding removal from NTS determination means that interconnect revenue probably to be less than geographic numbers. This will effective

[asterisk-biz] Changes of rules on 08x revenue share numbering in the UK

2006-04-19 Thread Linus Surguy
Dear All, The information below is not directly VoIP related, but will affect anyone in doing business in the UK using 08xx series numbers. Key points are that: 0870 to be charged at no more than a geographic number (unless a free to caller annoucement is made) with corresponding removal from N