Nice to see you reduced the price. As someone mentioned before I still don´t see how could I place a call to a Skype contact using mytelephone set. I am more insterested on being capable of routing incoming Skype calls to my Asterisk PBX.
Maybe you could bring a service just like someone else menti
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Race
Vanderdecken
Sent: segunda-feira, 9 de outubro de 2006 15:02
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] Chanskype released
Kudos for creating Chanskype, good
, NC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paulo
Mannheimer
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:20 PM
To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] Chanskype released
Hi folks,
for those who have been waiting the last two weeks, we
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:27:45PM -0700, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
did you test both the xvfb as well as a hardware based X server? I dont
see why xvfb will have much impact difference if there is a tdm card vs
not having one.
(for those that dont know, xvfb iu
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 21:06 -0300, Paulo Mannheimer wrote:
Well, based on objective testing, and not on subjective second-guessing, we
have learned that X and asterisk just don´t mix well when you add a TDM board.
did you test both the xvfb as well as a
Alberto
Sagredo
Sent: quarta-feira, 4 de outubro de 2006 03:32
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Chanskype released
So which ones which tested this version and bought license code for this
first want, we will be able to test next version?.
Regards
So which ones which tested this version and bought license code for this
first want, we will be able to test next version?.
Regards
Paulo Mannheimer escribió:
You are right. next release due by the end of this week will include the
source code for the asterisk portion.
Best regards,
Paulo
someone else) can revise it to eliminate a lot (or
maybe all) of that stuff.
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 02:44 +0200, Dovid B wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:20:49 -0400
> > From: Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Chanskype released
> &g
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:27:45PM -0700, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> did you test both the xvfb as well as a hardware based X server? I dont
> see why xvfb will have much impact difference if there is a tdm card vs
> not having one.
>
> (for those that dont know, xvfb ius the x virtual fra
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:20:49 -0400
From: Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Chanskype released
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Have you seen the requ
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 21:06 -0300, Paulo Mannheimer wrote:
> Well, based on objective testing, and not on subjective
> second-guessing, we have learned that X and asterisk just don´t mix
> well when you add a TDM board.
>
> But we live in a free world and people are free to believe in what
>
Well, based on objective testing, and not on subjective
second-guessing, we have learned that X and asterisk just don´t mix
well when you add a TDM board.
But we live in a free world and people are free to believe in what
they want to believe :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
You are right. next release due by the end of this week will include
the source code for the asterisk portion.
Best regards,
Paulo Mannheimer
Are you going to release it as a module we can install in asterisk to
provide a *channel*? Until then it's not really a "channel", it's a
*gat
Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
Mark Phillips wrote:
VNC Server (why?)
It's the most efficient way of having multiple instances of X so
multiple Skype clients can be loaded. By the way, we have this running
in production with 50+ simultaneous calls in one machine. It works.
Juan
_
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 18:34 -0300, Bernardo Vieira wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You're right, I can't imagine anyone in their right mind running X along
> with * in a production environment.
If you really wanted this, you could run the X virtual framebuffer,
which
Mark Phillips wrote:
VNC Server (why?)
It's the most efficient way of having multiple instances of X so
multiple Skype clients can be loaded. By the way, we have this running
in production with 50+ simultaneous calls in one machine. It works.
Juan
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're right, I can't imagine anyone in their right mind running X along
with * in a production environment.
Mark Phillips wrote:
> Have you seen the requirements for this?
>
> You need to have the Skype crap installed on your Asterisk machine. You
>
Have you seen the requirements for this?
You need to have the Skype crap installed on your Asterisk machine. You
need X installed on your machine (much against the recommendations of
Digium et al), VNC Server (why?), not to mention the usual compiler
stuff.
Their own web page says they're just us
Are you going to release it as a module we can install in asterisk to
provide a *channel*? Until then it's not really a "channel", it's a
*gateway*.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 17:20 -0300, Paulo Mannheimer wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> for those who have been waiting the last two weeks, we just rele
Hi folks,
for those who have been waiting the last two weeks, we just released the
initial version of Chanskype.
With Chanskype your asterisk box will be able to dial out either to a
skype buddy or using the skypeout network.
try and buy it at www.chanskype.com
Best regards,
Paulo H. Mannheime
20 matches
Mail list logo
