Sent via handheld
-Original Message-
From: Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:40:05
To:Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium Relaxes Google Adword Policy
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 18:03 -0600, Danny Windham
Sent via handheld
-Original Message-
From: Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:40:05
To:Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium Relaxes Google Adword Policy
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 18:03 -0600, Danny Windham
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 18:03 -0600, Danny Windham wrote:
> Over the past week Digium has received a number of charged responses
> regarding the recent change in policy regarding use of Digium
> trademarked terms in Google AdWords. Some of the responses supported
> our attempts to better control the
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium Relaxes Google Adword Policy
I am very impressed with Danny's response. Not many CEOs will openly admit
their mistakes.
On my blog I wrote a more detailed response and suggestions
http://flatplanetphone.com/wordpress/?p=452
Moshe
Danny Windham
I am very impressed with Danny's response. Not many CEOs will
openly admit their mistakes.
On my blog I wrote a more detailed response and suggestions
http://flatplanetphone.com/wordpress/?p=452
Moshe
Danny Windham wrote:
Over the past week Digium has received a
number of char
t: [asterisk-biz] Digium Relaxes Google Adword Policy
Over the past week Digium has received a number of charged responses
regarding the recent change in policy regarding use of Digium
trademarked terms in Google AdWords. Some of the responses supported our
attempts to better control t
Over the past week Digium has received a number of charged responses
regarding the recent change in policy regarding use of Digium trademarked
terms in Google AdWords. Some of the responses supported our attempts to
better control the use of Digium trademarked terms. Some of the responses
disagreed
