Andres Paglayan wrote:
>On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Lenz wrote:
>
>
>
>>Interesting stuff to read:
>>
>>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/microsoft-
>>response-point-review.asp
>>
>>Looks way more rigid than Asterisk, but surely an interesting
>>package for
>>SMBs.
>>What do
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Lenz wrote:
> Interesting stuff to read:
>
> http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/microsoft-
> response-point-review.asp
>
> Looks way more rigid than Asterisk, but surely an interesting
> package for
> SMBs.
> What do you think?
> l.
as soon as I dow
No T1 support, thats interesting.
On Nov 12, 2007 3:27 AM, Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting stuff to read:
>
> http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/microsoft-response-point-review.asp
>
> Looks way more rigid than Asterisk, but surely an interesting package for
> SMBs.
>
Interesting stuff to read:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/microsoft-response-point-review.asp
Looks way more rigid than Asterisk, but surely an interesting package for
SMBs.
What do you think?
l.
--
Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics
http://queuemetrics.com
