In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:38 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > where you continued to decline to answer in favor of handwaving.
> >
> Ok, it was about my opinion, why do you feel that you can demand an
> explan
Steve Totaro wrote:
*snipped
> You two have always posted good reads to the list. No sense making
> enemies over silly stuff, life is to short. It's not like he shot
> your dog
>
poor fluffy!
I agree with Steve on this one.. tomorrow is friday.. let small ** go.
__
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 08:22:58PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> > Look you two, you are both very valuable members of this community.
>
> Well, I'm flattered, but you may give me too much credit. Nonetheless,
> Bret's
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 08:22:58PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> Look you two, you are both very valuable members of this community.
Well, I'm flattered, but you may give me too much credit. Nonetheless,
Bret's in my kill file, and I'm done with it.
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:50:04AM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:38 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > > where you continued to decline to answer in favor of handwaving.
> > >
> > O
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 02:08:58AM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> I dont think its that clear, because I am not the one throwing tantrums
> because someone failed to justify their feelings. Nor am I the one
> saying that someone is defensive by suggesting that this is not the
> proper ve
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:50:04AM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:38 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > where you continued to decline to answer in favor of handwaving.
> >
> Ok, it was about my opinion, why do you feel that you can demand an
> explanation of my f
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:56 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> On April 3, 2008 07:50:04 pm Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> > Ok, it was about my opinion, why do you feel that you can demand an
> > explanation of my feelings on an off topic subject?
>
> You're the one who opened the subje
On April 3, 2008 07:50:04 pm Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> Ok, it was about my opinion, why do you feel that you can demand an
> explanation of my feelings on an off topic subject?
You're the one who opened the subject. He asked. I'm actually pretty curious
too. You decline to answer, he ca
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:38 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> where you continued to decline to answer in favor of handwaving.
>
Ok, it was about my opinion, why do you feel that you can demand an
explanation of my feelings on an off topic subject?
> My observation of the last 30 years of Unix de
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:15:06PM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> > On the other hand, it may be that you're complaining about *having to
> > assign your copyright to Digium*, which would be an entirely different
> > issue: you would be unhappy that they could then themselves dual-license
I also wouldnt/cant contribute to GPL licensed software, due to personal
reasons and well restrictions set by employers at times. I actually avoid
all use of GPL software in development whenever possible which is 90% of the
time. My preference is when it comes to using software, well for customers
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 11:46 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> Just curious why you look at it that way, Bret.
>
> The only reason I could see why someone would decline to contribute
> to a GPLd project would seem to be handily dealt with merely by
> dual-licensing your code GPL and BSD.
>
You sug
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> dtmf in asterisk (rfc2833) violates the rfc. There are many switches
> that usually are only "big carrier types" that do not properly deal with
> what asterisk sends. I gave oej specifics as he was doing something
> relat
14 matches
Mail list logo
