Last year, I spent a lot of time rewriting SIP transfers in chan_sip, in
order to enhance the support for attended transfers, especially in the
case where two servers where supported. This was paid for by a service
provider, who after they installed it in their production systems
decided not
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 11:28 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
Even though it works in their environment, there is still some work to
do to finish this quite large change and make it more generic and
complete for standalone servers, as well as cleaning the source code up
for peer review and
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 11:28 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
Even though it works in their environment, there is still some work to
do to finish this quite large change and make it more generic and
complete for standalone servers, as well as cleaning the source
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:05 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 11:28 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
Even though it works in their environment, there is still some work to
do to finish this quite large change and make it more generic and
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
I think what you are saying, and please correct me if I am wrong, is
that most of what you are doing in terms of these features is already
done, and that its to work with the current chan_sip, basically just
adding features to it.
Is that correct?
Yes, the
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:38 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
I think what you are saying, and please correct me if I am wrong, is
that most of what you are doing in terms of these features is already
done, and that its to work with the current chan_sip,
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:38 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
I think what you are saying, and please correct me if I am wrong, is
that most of what you are doing in terms of these features is already
done, and that its to work
