Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-26 Thread Alistair Cunningham
that true? > > Juan > > > > From: acunning...@integrics.com > To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:01:16 + > CC: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6 > > Juan, > We're happy with 1.6

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-26 Thread Juan Sandro
: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6 Juan, We're happy with 1.6.1. I would agree strongly that if there's no specific reason to upgrade then you should stay on a version you're happy with. -- Alistair Cunningham+1 888 468 3111+44 20

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Olle E. Johansson
24 feb 2010 kl. 15.45 skrev Chris Bagnall: >> Can someone please let me know if you have a such experience? >> Also, do you have any other negative or positive comments on 1.6 > > Most of our clients are still on 1.4 installs - I must admit largely because > of the time taken to rewrite the num

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Alistair Cunningham
uctions for upgrading your product. As always, there's no reason to upgrade if there are no features you need. 1.4 is still a supported release. Best regards, /Olle > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:35:22 +0000 > From: acunning...@integrics.com > To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com &

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Juan Sandro
oduct. As always, there's no reason to upgrade if there are no features you need. 1.4 is still a supported release. Best regards,/Olle > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:35:22 +0000 > From: acunning...@integrics.com > To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] subject:

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Chris Bagnall
> Can someone please let me know if you have a such experience? > Also, do you have any other negative or positive comments on 1.6 Most of our clients are still on 1.4 installs - I must admit largely because of the time taken to rewrite the numerous AEL macros we've written over the years into t

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Alistair Cunningham
Juan, We've recently moved from 1.4 to 1.6.1 for new Enswitch installations. Existing customers are also gradually migrating over (even though we don't require it), mostly for T.38 support. I would estimate that 8 to 10 production carrier Enswitch systems have been migrated so far. We did have

Re: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread John Rousseau
iginal Message- From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Juan Sandro Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:19 AM To: Digium Subject: [asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6 Hi Guys We are using asterisk 1.4 on all of our platforms f

[asterisk-biz] subject: 1.4 vs 1.6

2010-02-24 Thread Juan Sandro
Hi Guys We are using asterisk 1.4 on all of our platforms for a while now. Some of our partners recommended to use asterisk 1.6 in order to improve overall stability and performance. Can someone please let me know if you have a such experience? Also, do you have any other negative or positive