Paul,
Bicom's box seems to be a Stratus ftServer. It is basically one
server consisting of two servers that act as one. So if for example
the cpu or ram on box1 blows up, the system should automagically
switch over to using box2 which should be in the same state as box1
before it blew up
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Patrick,
That is correct. Calls in progress may be dropped, but if callers
immediately call back they will be routed through a
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:12 +, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Paul,
Bicom's box seems to be a Stratus ftServer. It is basically one
server consisting of two servers that act as one. So if for example
the cpu or ram on box1 blows up, the system should automagically
switch over to using
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Patrick,
That is correct. Calls in progress may be dropped, but if callers
immediately call back
Our ftRACK is not Stratus box.. And yes.. It will not drop any calls
if hardware fails.
Thanks for your answer. Upon closer inspection indeed it is not a
Stratus box but seems to be a NEC. Looking at the pics in the rpm
below I guess it's a NEC Express 5800/320Lc-R. Afaik NEC licenses
Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk - Reseller Options (Resend)
Glenn,
You might want to consider Druid's OEM program where you get to co-brand
Druid using your own logo and add custom pages
http://www.voiceroute.net/site/index.php?p=partners
Druid description is at:
http
Voiceroute looks neat. Unfortunately, there are numerous typos on the site,
which make the company a huge turn-off. If the company doesn't care enough
to check for typing corrections, why do I think they'll care about the
customer base?
On 2/3/07, Ming Guang Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]; Commercial and Business-Oriented
Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk - Reseller Options (Resend)
Voiceroute looks neat. Unfortunately, there are numerous typos on the site,
which make the company a huge turn-off. If the company doesn't care enough
to check for typing
Matt,
I would like to correct our typos. If you could kindly let me know where
you have spotted it, I appreciate it. I just gone through the site
recently and did not spot any myself.
It is not excuse for the typo if there is any but our focus is our
customers the product which if you did
Glenn,
You may care consider Enswitch:
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/
On this page you will find links to a list of features and working demo
of the web interface. It's in production today at over 20 carrier
edition customers with up to tens of thousands of live paying users.
We're
and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk - Reseller Options (Resend)
Matt,
I would like to correct our typos. If you could kindly let me know where
you have spotted it, I appreciate it. I just gone through the site
recently and did not spot any myself
To: Matt; Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk - Reseller Options (Resend)
Matt,
I would like to correct our typos. If you could kindly let me know where
you have spotted it, I appreciate it. I just gone through the site
recently and did not spot any
Nice thread.
Nice replies too.
I would add to your list of requirements fault tolerance / redundancy models.
On 2/3/07, Glenn Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am resending again since I recieved an error the first time that I sent
this:
Hello,
I am currently researching various
Alejandro,
For Enswitch's fault tolerance and redundancy model, please see:
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/guides/latest/en/system/components/
and
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/guides/latest/en/system/architecture/
Alistair Cunningham
+1 888 468 3111
+44 20 799 39 799
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
Alejandro,
For Enswitch's fault tolerance and redundancy model, please see:
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/guides/latest/en/system/components/
and
Alistair...
Please explain how does above achieve fault tolerant requirements:
a/ no disruption to any
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 21:48 +, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
Alejandro,
For Enswitch's fault tolerance and redundancy model, please see:
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/guides/latest/en/system/components/
and
Alistair...
Please explain how
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Senad,
It seems that your solution supports graceful fail-over of calls *in
progress*. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Patrick
Patrick,
Pls refer to telecom industry
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Senad,
It seems that your solution supports graceful fail-over of calls *in
progress*. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Patrick
Patrick,
Pls refer to
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
Alejandro,
For Enswitch's fault tolerance and redundancy model, please see:
http://integrics.com/products/enswitch/guides/latest/en/system/components/
and
Alistair...
Please explain how does above achieve fault tolerant requirements:
Patrick wrote:
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Patrick,
That is correct. Calls in progress may be dropped, but if callers
immediately call back they will be routed through a surviving server. We
have never had
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 21:14 -0500, Paul wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Alistair,
It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls
*in progress*. Is that correct?
Senad,
It seems that your solution supports graceful fail-over of calls *in
progress*. Is that
Hi Glenn,
Look at PBXware to see if it fits your needs:
http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/
In addition we have a number of partner branding packages. More details
here:
http://www.bicomsystems.com/home/C/P/731/143_3234/
Senad
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Glenn,
You might want to consider Druid's OEM program where you get to co-brand
Druid using your own logo and add custom pages
http://www.voiceroute.net/site/index.php?p=partners
Druid description is at:
http://www.voiceroute.net/site/index.php?p=druid
We have a live demo
23 matches
Mail list logo
