Re: [PATCH] was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic(reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Brancaleoni Matteo
small printk typo. doesn't affect functionality and/or compilation. Matteo. -- Brancaleoni Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Espia - Emmegi Srl --- zaptel/wcfxs.c 2004-03-06 00:09:51.0 +0100 +++ wcfxs.c 2004-03-06 00:25:14.0 +0100 @@ -35,6 +35,22 @@ #include "proslic.h" #inclu

[PATCH] was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic(reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Brancaleoni Matteo
ok, just to who wanna try that here's the patch. I'm not sending it to bugs.digium.com unless for Digium that's ok. I'm using it and seems to work. Now I'm not experiencing anymore module reset caused by power alarms... lemme know *DISCLAIMER* Altough that is believed to be safe, I cannot t

[Asterisk-Dev] PostgreSQL patch for chan_iax2.c

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Sokol
I just uploaded a patch to bugs.digium.com to add Postgresql support to chan_iax2. It's really new -- not a lot of testing. Can somebody out there give it a whirl and see what happens? http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001157 Thanks Steve Steven Sokol Owner/Manager Sokol & Asso

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic (reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Rich Adamson
> > After I hit send I realized I was "out of context" with the original > > topic. For the central office based loops, the 12 to 30+ still holds > > true for many CO switches. There are still a large number of CO switches > > that are not current regulated loops; those are still I=E/R with E fixed

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic(reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Paul Winkeler
You beat me to it Matteo, I was about to ask that question myself. Also, we should then compute the load the card places on the power supply (+/- 12 volt specifically I suspect) so those of us with hand-me-down systems don't end up chasing a whole new set of problems, LOL! PaulW (216) 533-5708

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic (reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Brancaleoni Matteo
Hi > > Yikes. I was not aware of this. Thanks for the note though, along with > Matteo's fixes for "heavier" loads for the TDM400P I think the archives are > much better off for it all. :-) the patch is very simple, I'm preparing it. but before that, I really like that someone from Digium t

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic (reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> After I hit send I realized I was "out of context" with the original > topic. For the central office based loops, the 12 to 30+ still holds > true for many CO switches. There are still a large number of CO switches > that are not current regulated loops; those are still I=E/R with E fixed > at -4

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic (reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Rich Adamson
> > The 20ma loop is sort of typical. It actually can range from a low of > > about 12 ma up to about 30+ ma depending upon how far away from the > > central office the user happens to be, the gauge of copper plant, the > > telco engineers, etc. > > uh... The whole *point* of current loops is tha

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Raising loop current limit on the Proslic (reg.71)

2004-03-05 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> The 20ma loop is sort of typical. It actually can range from a low of > about 12 ma up to about 30+ ma depending upon how far away from the > central office the user happens to be, the gauge of copper plant, the > telco engineers, etc. uh... The whole *point* of current loops is that they are i