Re: [Asterisk-Dev] voicemail message number limits

2004-07-24 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Saturday 24 July 2004 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 23 Jul 2004 at 10:16, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > On Friday 23 July 2004 06:45, mattf wrote: > > > All you have to do is edit the /asterisk/apps/app_voicemail.c > > > file and change this line: > > > #define MAXMSG 100 > > > > > > change

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] UK Caller ID patch and new CVS

2004-07-24 Thread dking
On 23 Jul 2004 at 10:57, Dr. Rich Murphey wrote: > Perhaps it's not a question of elegant code but rather quality and > maintainability. Once code goes in, those are real issues that take time > and effort. So your saying that a working solution is less valuable in the long run then the extra

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] voicemail message number limits

2004-07-24 Thread dking
Or just #include the limits.h for the os in question and use the max value possible for the chosen data type. That sounds like a idea to me. On 23 Jul 2004 at 10:16, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Friday 23 July 2004 06:45, mattf wrote: > > All you have to do is edit the /asterisk/apps/app_voicema

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] UK Caller ID patch and new CVS

2004-07-24 Thread dking
So where is the patch set? On 23 Jul 2004 at 15:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote: > Hi folks, >First, many thanks to the good people who developed this patch set. > I now get Caller ID on my home line, so I do have a use for the > Pissy that was keeping my door open (and one of its PCI slot

[Asterisk-Dev] 2.6 Build directory

2004-07-24 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi Why not taking directly the good directory from the Kbuild system ? Sylvain Munaut --- zaptel/Makefile2004-02-10 11:54:57.965004088 +0100 +++ zaptel/Makefile2004-02-10 11:56:19.186656520 +0100 @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ linux26: linux26: prereq $(BINS) - @if ! [ -d /usr/src/linux-2.6 ]; the

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: Asterisk Book Reviewer

2004-07-24 Thread Andy Powell
On 16/07/2004 at 12:04 Tilghman Lesher wrote: >On Friday 16 July 2004 08:30, Louay Fatoohi wrote: >> Packt Publishing is in the process of developing a book about Asterisk, >and >> we are looking for experienced users of Asterisk to act as technical >> reviewers. I have seen some of your posts to

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] UK Caller ID patch and new CVS

2004-07-24 Thread Rich Adamson
> Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Its also fairly common knowledge the x100p was not designed/built by > > digium, but rather they choose to use an existing modem card that had > > the chipsets (etc) that could be used for entry-level systems at a > > very low cost, and those cards _were_