Hi Benjk.
First
If you wish to develop for support to INS1500,
maybe I can assist japanese ISDN developer to you.
and Now I have a solution is another way of connect to INS1500 without
Dialogic.
I think that is maybe cheaper than to use Dialogic.
Surely that solution already authorized 'JATE'
> If somebody sends me a card, I have a INS500 here and I can provide full
> remote access to the server for testing.
Hi Isamar,
Since when do you have the INS1500? We actually talked about how it
would be an advantage if we could get zaptel working on J1 when you
were here in Tokyo, remember? Ye
no need to do this.
just get the fresh 2.6.8.1 kernel and compile it on FC2.
everything will run OK now
- shabanip
- Original Message -
From: "Micha? Mosiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:38 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] Kernel 2.6.8-1.521
I've noticed problems with zaptel on various kernel from Fedora C2. Most of
the time I had some core dumps from tools like ztcfg. My TDM400P cards
denied working.
I have found out that the problem was actually a UNIT(file) macro
calculation. The way it is done, it returns very strange results with
>
> yes. It requires twiddling 2 bits on the framer chip (at least in the
> T100P). I made changes to the T100P driver to support this, but never
> could test it.
If somebody sends me a card, I have a INS500 here and I can provide full
remote access to the server for testing.
__
J1 requires hardware support from the framer, but this is no problem.
The framer chip used on the TE405P and TE410P cards supports J1. The
framers for the other Digium cards probably do too. The current driver
software probably doesn't, but the necessary changes should be minor.
yes. It require
hi,
i'm under the impression that this feature is not available in asterisk,
consider this scenario:
- you are the operator. you answer a call from outside and you want to
transfer it to one of the extensions. after you transfer, if the person
you transferred the call to, doesn't pick up or if hi
On 08 Sep 2004 18:22:00 -0600, Steve Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about a software configuration, instead of a "closed" or "CVS head"
> version. License a combination of certain versions of each of the files
> involved in the release. Running newer/different versions of these files
> in
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
Hi
in a private email exchange, John Todd said I should post this to the
Dev list. He thought it would at least have some curiosity value even
for those who are not interested in Japanese PRI. Anyway ...
Japanese PRI is derived from US PRI but the Japanese
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 10:03, Matthew Boehm wrote:
That's a $100 card and I'd really rather not add more hardware to this
machine. It might not even have an open slot for it. If it does, does
anything need to be plugged into the card to use it for MeetMe or can it
Hi again,
Well naturally all the info on the web is set up TE410P or similar with several spans
on one card.. Sorry my mistake
Kind regards,
Claus
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
You'll have to forgive me if this seems like a stupid question, but
I'm more than a little drunk.
Does the Busycount=8/Busydetect=yes etc actually check for the length
of tone defined in indications.conf?
Reason being that it seems it is hanging up lines if it receives 8 x
the_tone_specified a
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have this strange issue with two single E1 cards (E100P), apparrently when having
> a zaptel.conf looking like the following (which should be correct according to the
> instructions found everywhere)
>
> span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
> bc
Hi Guys,
I have this strange issue with two single E1 cards
(E100P), apparrently when having a zaptel.conf looking like the following (which
should be correct according to the instructions found everywhere)
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4bchan=1-15bchan=17-31dchan=16
span=2,2,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4bch
Thanks
Claus
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rob Gagnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] RFC3389 problem a little more info..
> Should b
15 matches
Mail list logo
