I'd like to be able to simply (without running ioctl's) query (and possibly
adjust) the Zaptel hardware via /proc/zaptel -- like a lot of other Linux
hardware does.
I'm not sure if anyone else would have much use for this sort of thing or
not, but I can see a few applications where it would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Thomas Horsten wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are contravening the Skype terms and conditions of use by making any
attempt to reverse engineer. Its as closed as closed can be.
Daniel Pocock wrote:
I believe IAX is much closer to achieving this goal than SIP or H323,
but Skype's protocol is more successful at getting through firewalls
and NAT because of two things (which I openly admit I haven't verified
myself, so please correct me if I've been mis informed):
- all co
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Whisker, Peter wrote:
> > Maybe we need to look at the possibility of IAX over HTTP
>
> You'd have to write a wrapper protocol because HTTP is text based and
> IAX is binary. This would probably lead to inefficiencies. Efficiency
> is one of the main strengths of IAX.
Stev
I am trying to modify the ASTCC AGI to use postgres as the backend database.
I have edited the DBI to connect successful to the database. The AGI runs
properly till it gets to the selection of the trunk. The database insert to
the cdrs table with CHANUNAVAIL.
It seems to me that the SELECT stateme
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:40:24PM -0700, Tracy R Reed spake thusly:
> I am trying to get my 7914 working with asterisk 1.0.0 and the latest
A few more things while I'm at it:
The wiki page with the 7914-HOWTO says:
* 1. Configure the /etc/asterisk/sccp.conf according to our example to
suppo
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Jan Czmok spake thusly:
> Bryan Vyhmeister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a Cisco 7914 Expansion Module and desk stand for 7960 plus 7914
> > that I would be willing to make available for chan_sccp development. Is
> > anyone interested?
> >
>
> T
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> On the server where you do not want mailboxes, just forward the call to
> the server where you have mailboxes. It's a dialplan configuration, easy
> to set up.
>
> However, if you want voicemail notification in SIP, we have a problem to
> solve that i
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:30:26 +0200, Olle E. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check Dundi, in CVS head of Asterisk. http://www.dundi.com
>
> Mark Spencer's latest innovation ;-)
Beautiful!
And I particularly like the part that says "the remarkably simple and
concise ENUM ..." :-)
But anyw
Fernando Romo wrote:
2) Make a project wher we make a "Central IAX Directory" (Skype Like)
where we deposit our "contact" channels and a kind of "signature" to try
to make a "trusted" Phone comunity. This derivate two efforts:
Check Dundi, in CVS head of Asterisk. http://www.dundi.com
Mark Spence
Chris Lee wrote:
Reinhard Max wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 15:38, Chris Lee wrote:
so what I was suggesting was a peer-to-peer fabric that can help
with the membership, naming and call receipt issues so that IAX
could pick up some of the ease of use provided by the supernodes.
I think you are as
Hi all,
I'm interesting in VoiceXML and Asterisk integration. Could somebody push me, as
a beginner user, in right direction to find real appropriate solutions in this
subject, please?
I appreciate any help provided!
With best regards,
Vasya.
___
Ast
Fernando Romo wrote:
2) Make a project wher we make a "Central IAX Directory" (Skype Like)
where we deposit our "contact" channels and a kind of "signature" to try
to make a "trusted" Phone comunity. This derivate two efforts:
As someone already pointed out IAXTEL, but there are a number of other
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:01:43 +0100, Daniel Pocock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are
> still many networks (eg hotels) where users have little control over
> infrastructure and they just want to 'plug and play'.
I happen to be travelling a lot and actually know about the difference
between wi
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:00:35 -0500, Fernando Romo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand your position about Skype and agree with you in the fact of
> support AIX, but... i still think and i propose the idea of the skype
> channel, is take two actions about it:
>
> 1) Press the Skype people to
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:38:05 +0100, Chris Lee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, all fair comments, though Hype may be a substantial part of why
> skype is doing well it is also not true to say it is not ease of use.
I didn't say it was not ease of use. What I said was that there are
others which a
--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 22:48 +0800 Steve Underwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ben
Have you bought into the hype about internet time? :-)
I said it was being tested, and it is. SS7 is quite big, so you don't
give it a quick try and say all is well. It is functioning well enough to
be h
Benjamin:
I understand your position about Skype and agree with you in the fact of
support AIX, but... i still think and i propose the idea of the skype
channel, is take two actions about it:
1) Press the Skype people to Open the Protocol and make and effort to
make the channel
2) Make a proje
18 matches
Mail list logo
