[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brian West said the following in another thread:
>> Leif and I have done one on one code/doc writing line by line in some
>> cases.
And we've done one one one talking/writing. The guy with the fast mouth
talks, the guy with the fast fingers types.
> And Jim Van Meggelen
I have the meetme box up and ready for many many ulaw connections...
bkw
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif Madsen
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:12 AM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Aster
Leif Madsen wrote:
> Originally posted in was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Bug Tracker /
> Feature Requests (my take)
>
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:24:23 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd truly love to get my head deeper into that stuff. Actually, when
>> you said ". . . this looks lik
Brian West said the following in another thread:
> Leif and I have done one on one code/doc writing line by line in some cases.
And Jim Van Meggelen said in another thread:
> You know what, if we could pick an app and pick the brains of the dev
> team as to what it does, we could possibly have a w
> Funny enough bkw mentioned the same thing tonight on the conference.
> I think going through and documenting the code would be a great way to
> learn it, and help to lower the learning curve for those who come
> after.
Leif and I have done one on one code/doc writing line by line in some cases.
Originally posted in was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Bug Tracker / Feature
Requests (my take)
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:24:23 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd truly love to get my head deeper into that stuff. Actually, when you
> said ". . . this looks like our chance to get involved .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim wrote:
>> Here's something I'd happily spend an entire day at an Astricon
>> doing: if someone were generous enough to present "a lovingly
>> painful, newbies introduction to Asterisk source code", I for one
>> would be ears, eyes and mind WIDE open. I realize that on
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:25:43 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For everyone who was ignoring the pimpking thread, it has matured rather
> tamely into something more constructive. Therefore, it made sense to me
> to start a new, relevant thread.
>
> The idea was suggested that a o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 03/01/2005 14:12 Leif Madsen said the following:
>> I think all your ideas were quite valid and should be explored
>> further.
>
> if the gurus are willing to prepare slides and to speak, i'd
> be more than
> glad to arrange/coordinate the logistics for the above. so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Anyone else feel like they want to contribute to the code, but feel
>> overwhelemed about were to begin?
>
>> Of course, I'm not sure if having a bunch of untrained hacks descend
>> on the code is exacly what's needed, but everyone has to start
>> somewhere.
>
> If you
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:15:31 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen a lot of people ask in #asterisk for a "to-do" list or help
> for how to get started with development, but I never had a good answer for
> them. I'm hoping that we can come up with a way to provide
11 matches
Mail list logo
