Can't you spell Win32?
f.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the
same problem:
There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729.Refrain from posting
illegal links.
Jeremy McNamara
Damn, better tell VoiceAge:
http://www.voi
Brian West wrote:
The problem is stable is old and is missing alot of the features people
are wanting.
Then we need stable release from CVS-HEAD. Yet, I keep hearing it's 3
- 6 months away.
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
ht
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
> >> Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the
> >> same problem:
> >
> >There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729.Refrain from posting
> >illegal links.
> >
> Damn, better tell VoiceAge:
> http://www.voiceage.com/c
On Mar 2, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian West wrote:
Just use CVS-HEAD Think just because the "stable" branch has the
word stable in it... doesn't mean its stable. CVS-HEAD is no less
stable than the stable branch.
I just don't understand comments like this.
>> Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the
>> same problem:
>
>There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729.Refrain from posting
>illegal links.
>
>Jeremy McNamara
Damn, better tell VoiceAge:
http://www.voiceage.com/codecsite/openinit_g729.php
-Michael
__
Ok lets fix this now... Open logger.conf and take debug,warning and
notice away from the console line. Then you won't have to ask WHY you
get errors/warnings/notices. 99% of the time they are meaningless.
/b
On Mar 2, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On March 2, 2005 05:50 pm, Jeremy
I recommended that already and he pretty much said NO. He said he was
open to new ideas... except when it comes to this one :P
/b
On Mar 2, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Remember, I am not suggesting that we remove the current format,
just add a new optional p
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian West wrote:
> Just use CVS-HEAD Think just because the "stable" branch has the
> word stable in it... doesn't mean its stable. CVS-HEAD is no less
> stable than the stable branch.
I just don't understand comments like this. The entire reason that a 1.0
branch exi
On March 2, 2005 05:50 pm, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729.Refrain from posting
> illegal links.
He never said it was open source, and his website clearly says you need to
adhere to your country's patent laws... I don't see the problem?
-A.
_
I've seen G729E being implemented elsewhere. Anyone know what it adds to the
table?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 5:41 PM
> To: Jacky; Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [
Is there a web based manager program (java) that can connect via another
webserver to a asterisk server and manage / view simple stuff like queue
status and other features? without actually beeing on the asterisk box
itself. Remote mangement connection via http/java?
__
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the
> > same problem:
>
> There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729. Refrain from posting
> illegal links.
Well, let's be precise. The implementation *is*
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Remember, I am not suggesting that we remove the current format,
just add a new optional parseable format with complete data instead of
the stripped data being presented in the CLI.
Why don't we take Tim Clark's suggestion and move the manager from the
core to be a modul
Daniel Pocock wrote:
Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the
same problem:
There is no OPEN SOURCE implementation of G.729.Refrain from posting
illegal links.
Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@
Preston Garrison wrote:
Has anyone worked on any code or have any experience doing answering
machine detection. Someone I was talking to was telling me something
like normal callers do more mhz? :) Which I assume maybe they mean
that a normal caller sends higher frequencies since its not
pre-
Just use CVS-HEAD Think just because the "stable" branch has the
word stable in it... doesn't mean its stable. CVS-HEAD is no less
stable than the stable branch.
/b
On Mar 2, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Juan Jose Comellas wrote:
Is anybody using MOH without mpg123 (using native codecs) in the
curren
G729A vs G729B ... they are stream compatible. B on the other hand has
VAD and a few other things. B is more complex than A but they are 100%
compatible.
/b
On Mar 2, 2005, at 5:14 AM, Jacky wrote:
Hi, all,
I have buy 5 Digium's G.729A codec(it just support G.729A license)
When I calll with 2
> Hmm. That's not the way I treat "events". At least we should have an
> ActionID that binds them together with the request. I would do it
> differently though, without using the Event: header.
Well, you can just add the ActionID to the request. I just copied the
behaviour seen when requesting '
On March 1, 2005 10:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All I said is that if one needs assistance to 'grep tonezone */*c', one
> probably won't be a good contributor, and instead would just sap our time
> with requests for help. Nothing is wrong with requests for help - but if
> you didn't do your h
The Digium implementation is closed source :( unlike the rest of
Asterisk, so you probably won't be able to troubleshoot this yourself.
Try the open source implementation and let me know if you have the same
problem:
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729
Make sure you are watching the A
Hi, all,
I have buy 5 Digium's G.729A codec(it just support G.729A license)
When I calll with 2 SIP UA that support G.729A and G.729B, its rtp frame
have some problem when softswitch with Asterisk.
The voice frame have been drop, so sometime I can't hear voice.
If I want to fix the problem whe
Lattanzio Francesco wrote:
I don't see the problem here. I posted a question, then you can:
1) answer, if you want to and know the answer;
2) ignore it, if you don't want to or don't know the answer.
That's all. Flames go straight from my mail client into /dev/null and are just
a waste of
Hi Olle,
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Marks response was that he doesn't want to see any XML in manager.
Period.
This upset me a bit, so in a childish way I simply closed the bug
reports...
I will discuss this with him at von next week, but if you have any
opinions pro and con XML in manager, plea
I don't see the problem here. I posted a question, then you can:
1) answer, if you want to and know the answer;
2) ignore it, if you don't want to or don't know the answer.
That's all. Flames go straight from my mail client into /dev/null and are just
a waste of (your) time.
Cheers.
--
F
24 matches
Mail list logo
