Re: [asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

2006-02-23 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:15:07AM +1100, James Harper wrote: > > > > My thoughts along the lines of a fully sysfs/hotplug enabled Zaptel > > include supporting 'named' spans... this could help in that area. > > I'd like to add my vote to this, or something like it. I've just started > toying wit

RE: [asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

2006-02-23 Thread Steven
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:15 +1100, James Harper wrote: > > > > My thoughts along the lines of a fully sysfs/hotplug enabled Zaptel > > include supporting 'named' spans... this could help in that area. > > I'd like to add my vote to this, or something like it. I've just started > toying with the '

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: TDMoE protocol

2006-02-23 Thread Paul Cadach
Hello, James Harper wrote: [skipped] > > Paul Cadach mentioned something about a jitter buffer for TDMoE, but > > I don't know whether he was talking about an idea or some real code. > > > > I'm also thinking about a jitter buffer, but it's tricky. I might > > decide to combine ztdummy with ztdyna

RE: [asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

2006-02-23 Thread James Harper
> > My thoughts along the lines of a fully sysfs/hotplug enabled Zaptel > include supporting 'named' spans... this could help in that area. I'd like to add my vote to this, or something like it. I've just started toying with the 'dynamic' spans and it gets confusing as hell. And even without hots

RE: [asterisk-dev] Re: TDMoE protocol

2006-02-23 Thread James Harper
> > When I referred to "lost packets", I was meaning from the perspective of > the Zaptel layer. In the current TDMoE implementation, there is absolutely > no jitter buffer. Packets can come in on the Ethernet with jitter, > depending on what else is sharing the LAN and the NIC, but the zaptel > d

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] get register info from peer section in sip.conf ?

2006-02-23 Thread Denis Smirnov
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote: OEJ> I had a patch that did the opposite, and that's where we are going. OEJ> I want to have "register=yes" within a peer section and remove the OEJ> register= statement from the [general] section. Is it patch merged to test-this-b

[asterisk-dev] Re: Best sound format / sample rate for french translated Asterisk sounds?

2006-02-23 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philippe Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have just finished the recording of the french translations of the > Asterisk 1.2.X sounds. For the moment, it a WAV with CD quality sample rate. > (WAV PCM 44.1kHz, 16 bits, stéréo, 172 kbits/s) > > The english sound

[asterisk-dev] Okay can somebody explain this...

2006-02-23 Thread Chuck Bunn
Hi, I got rid of the messages I was getting in the CDR (pbx.c: Cannot find extension context 'default') by adding a blank 'default' context at the front of my extensions.conf (I use the context 'extensions-home') this also (well sort of ) fixed my problem with blind transfers. I can blind tra

[asterisk-dev] Sending Channel Variables on events.

2006-02-23 Thread Chris Howard
I need a way to receive channel variable data on certain events. For example we are setting a contact_code on a channel in an AGI and we need to be able to retrieve the contact_code via the AgentCalled manager event. What I did was patch app_queue to use the pbx_builtin_serialize_variables functi

Re: [asterisk-dev] Best sound format / sample rate for french translated Asterisk sounds?

2006-02-23 Thread Denis Smirnov
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:37:31PM -0500, Rusty Dekema wrote: RD> The best-quality codecs that Asterisk currently supports are ulaw and RD> alaw. Using one of those will result in the best sound quality. _best_ quality would be with slinear. -- JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 58417635 (please, use

Re: [asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

2006-02-23 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steven Critchfield wrote: > Neither way helps when you contemplate the idea of hot swappable cards. > > Maybe we need to be able to expose up what card the channel is on and > then further a span and channel. My thoughts along the lines of a fully sysfs/hotplug enabled Zaptel include supportin

Re: [asterisk-dev] Test my cool new sexy test-branch! * Extra Asterisk-bonus awards this week

2006-02-23 Thread Denis Smirnov
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:17:11AM +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote: >>#5090 OEJ> That patch does not apply cleanly to trunk, or at least not to OEJ> this version of trunk... I attached patch, updated to trunk revision 10890. -- JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 58417635 (please, use jabber, if you can)

Re: [asterisk-dev] Best sound format / sample rate for french translated Asterisk sounds?

2006-02-23 Thread Rusty Dekema
The best-quality codecs that Asterisk currently supports are ulaw and alaw. Using one of those will result in the best sound quality. -Rusty On 2/23/06, Philippe Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We have just finished the recording of the french translations of the > Asterisk 1.2.X sounds

Re: [asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

2006-02-23 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 10:24 -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > I've thought about this a little bit more, and I think we need to have a > channel name format which is significantly different, in order to make > it absolutely clear that it is specified as span/relative-channel, > rather than absolute-c