Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
With most cellular base stations each press of the buttons on the
phone produces a fixed length DTMF pulse, with a fixed silence
following it. If you press keys in quick succession, they are
buffered up, and played out as tones at the pace the
Peter Beckman wrote:
The fact that flags to voicemail (though you point
out that his is changing - sweet!) are part of the mailbox# string is
confusing when the Dial flags are a comma delimited part of the
parameters.
Actually, the options string to Voicemail was moved to the end even
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 19:25 -0400, Peter Beckman wrote:
Change always breaks things. The question is when does breaking things
now make things better in the future? Sure, changing around a few strange
function syntaxes won't make much of a difference. But I do think that
On Sunday 23 April 2006 18:46, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
It must add a lot of code to parse out all of that stuff, and
having an inconsistent method of calling functions make both
documentation confusing and the user/admin confused. It makes
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Russell Bryant wrote:
Peter Beckman wrote:
The fact that flags to voicemail (though you point
out that his is changing - sweet!) are part of the mailbox# string is
confusing when the Dial flags are a comma delimited part of the
parameters.
Actually, the options
I also thought the same until found that if I press buttons
on my Treo650 too fast, DTMF tones did not get recognized
by my Cisco IVR. I think there are different behaviours
with different phones.
On 24 April 2006 04:52, Steve Underwood wrote:
Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hello--
I see this discussion about DTMF in Asterisk, and at the danger of
forking the discussion, I dare here to present a problem I've been
having with DTMF...
I have an FXO Zap card (X100P) in my system, and I've got the privacy
manager being run on incoming calls.
The county's school