Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Gary Reuter wrote:
In my case, I'm using 1.2.5 stable, and when I try to use the g729
codec (PRI w/ g711 one side, Polycom w/ g729 SIP-side), the audio
becomes 'worbly' (for lack of a better word) after a few seconds, and
the SIP channel has disappeared
Chris Frey wrote:
> With the recent news of Phil Zimmerman's Zfone software, is there any
> interest in implementing the ZRTP protocol in Asterisk?
Olle Johansson spent some time with Phil at the recent SIPit event, and
put a proof-of-concept into a branch on our Subversion server. Yes, it's
poss
Hi,
I searched the user and dev archives and didn't see mention of this.
With the recent news of Phil Zimmerman's Zfone software, is there any
interest in implementing the ZRTP protocol in Asterisk?
Thanks,
- Chris
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Greg Boehnlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006, Joseph Benden wrote:
>
> > I am running Asterisk 1.2.7.1 on a quad processor Solaris system and
> > have found a few issues that I resolved locally. But I do not use the
> > g729 codec, just g711 ulaw
Confirmation info is available on Zap channels with signaling protocols
that support it (such as ISDN, E&M, and a few others). Loopstart and
kewlstart (FXO and FXS) do not support answer confirmation (although
sometimes it is signaled by a polarity reversal or somethign similar).
You prob
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Joseph Benden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There have been a few posts lately about deadlocks and seg. faults with
> multiple cpus. Are you certain that the system seg. faults on the g729
> codec, or could it be that's just a symptom?
Kevin's pretty sure it is in the g729 codec modu
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Gary Reuter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Don't get your hopes up: I don't have a solution! ;-) I suffer from
> similar problems!
> You are talking about Digium's g729 codec, right? Which build (i686,
> prescott, etc?) are you using? Are you running single-CPU kernel or
> SMP?
We
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Fernando Romo wrote:
> I a know issue with the kernel headers of centos (Is not a Asterisk
> problem). Use this patchs in zaptel,c and torisa.c:
It segfaults w/out any Zaptel modules loaded, doing straight SIP w/ g729.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Se
I a know issue with the kernel headers of centos (Is not a Asterisk
problem). Use this patchs in zaptel,c and torisa.c:
For zaptel.c
---
Index: zaptel.c
===
--- zaptel.c(revision 989)
+++ zaptel.c(working copy)
@@
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone out there is successfully running
Asterisk 1.2 svn w/ Centos 4.3. I had an experience over the last two
weeks that has me scratching my head and muttering strange things in the
wee hours of the morning. I am going to try and be as descriptive as my
brain
md wrote:
> where idx < avl. If i modify that condition including a equal (idx<=avl)
> the error is solved. Why is not the equal in the condition?
If there is a bug in a patch that is sitting in Mantis, then Mantis is
the place to comment on that bug. Otherwise the poster of the patch may
not be
Hello,
that patch solves the problem but i find an error. The patch solve the
problem when the number of calls queued is less than the available and ready
agents. Example: if i have two available agent and two queued calls the call
is not delivered to the agent. In source of patch i see:
"+ /*
Sorry for the late reply, i was very busy and forgot about this
thread...
On Tue, 16 May 2006 18:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Christian B wrote:
> > No, tried this before(as well as the A()-option), this doesn't work
> > with the "answer confir
Quoting "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I started Asterisk with -vvvgc and the displayconnects is already set in the
manager.conf and the 'Connection attempt from xxx unable to authenticate' is the
full message I get. This last time it took at least 6 times until the connection
succeed
14 matches
Mail list logo
