RE: [asterisk-dev] 'IAX2 call variable passing between servers '

2006-08-08 Thread Steven
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 09:05 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:31 AM > > To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] 'IAX2 call variable passing > > between se

[asterisk-dev] jingle channel crash

2006-08-08 Thread Dome C.
Dear all, i'm testing Asterisk SVN-trunk-r39295 found dtmf in jingle channel source code. But when test call from gtalk Or jabbin asterisk crash. This is coredump file. http://221.128.124.202/core.8783.bz2 If someone not found this bug please let's me know. Dome C. _

RE: [asterisk-dev] 'IAX2 call variable passing between servers '

2006-08-08 Thread Douglas Garstang
> -Original Message- > From: Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:22 AM > To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List > Subject: RE: [asterisk-dev] 'IAX2 call variable passing > between servers > ' > > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 09:05 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:

RE: [asterisk-dev] 'IAX2 call variable passing between servers '

2006-08-08 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:12 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: > Why is it that whenever I ask tough questions, or point out the > obvious, some people, rather than being constructive, choose to resort > to name calling? Is that the best you can do? You did not ask a tough question. You point out you

[asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Beckman
Hey folks -- Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be added? It would be handy. Beckman --- Peter Beckman Internet Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
Peter Beckman wrote: Hey folks -- Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be added? It would be handy. Does libwrap support UDP? -- Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville, Chattanooga, and Montgomery. __

Re: [asterisk-dev] Centralized Conferencing Specifications in MeetMe

2006-08-08 Thread John Lange
I would like to second the comments about this sounding like a very worthwhile bit of work. Enhanced conference ability in Asterisk would be a great asset and I look forward to seeing it added to Asterisk in the near future as it looks like it has progressed quite far already. John On Fri, 2006-

[asterisk-dev] Zaptel drivers

2006-08-08 Thread Tim Johnson - Eclipse Electronic Systems
I hope I'm in the correct place to be asking this question. I'm having a hard time locating resources for assistance with the Zaptel modules and how to extract data from the character devices. In other words, not using Asterisk. I'm basically just using an E1 link to send basic PCM audio ove

Re: [asterisk-dev] Zaptel drivers

2006-08-08 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 14:33 -0500, Tim Johnson - Eclipse Electronic Systems wrote: > I hope I'm in the correct place to be asking this question. I'm having > a hard time locating resources for assistance with the Zaptel modules > and how to extract data from the character devices. In other word

Re: [asterisk-dev] Zaptel/Octasic License

2006-08-08 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
- Jeffrey C. Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some of the files in Zaptel have what appears to be a non-GPL license > attached to them. One in particular is include/apilib/octapi_bt0.h > which has this at the top of the file: I am addressing this shortly; I should have replacement files in

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Beckman
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: Peter Beckman wrote: Hey folks -- Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be added? It would be handy. Does libwrap support UDP? AFAIK Yes, based on the assumption that TFTP is UDP-based, and this email seems t

[asterisk-dev] minjitterbuffer for iax

2006-08-08 Thread Pavel Jezek
Hello developers, according to discussion in -users list in the past, seems that possibility of setting some minimum jitterbuffer value in iax2 new (current) implementation will be very welcome. I think, that can't be very hard to implement this user configurable treshold parameter, but can so

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 13:29, Peter Beckman wrote: > Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be > added? It would be handy. The fact that Asterisk does not have external dependencies now is entirely by design. Unless there's a convincing argument put through to start,

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
- Peter Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK Yes, based on the assumption that TFTP is UDP-based, and this > email > seems to confirm that libwrap access control via hosts.allow for > TFTP > (which uses UDP) is supported by libwrap: > http://www.xinetd.org/pipermail/xinetd/2

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Beckman
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Tuesday 08 August 2006 13:29, Peter Beckman wrote: Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be added? It would be handy. The fact that Asterisk does not have external dependencies now is entirely by design. Unless there's

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 17:15 -0400, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 13:29, Peter Beckman wrote: > >> Noticed that Asterisk doesn't use libwrap. Any reason? Could it be > >> added? It would be handy. > > > > The fact that Asterisk d

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 16:15, Peter Beckman wrote: > In a completely somewhat-related question, is this lack of > dependence on external libraries, other than the list below, the > reason why Asterisk does not use the seemingly common ./configure > scripts? It does in trunk. -- Tilghman ___

Re: [asterisk-dev] libwrap

2006-08-08 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 17:15 -0400, Peter Beckman wrote: > > In a completely somewhat-related question, is this lack of dependence on > external libraries, other than the list below, the reason why Asterisk > does not use the seemingly common ./configure scripts? Asterisk 1.4 will use autocon