Re: [asterisk-dev] SIP Interoperability in Asterisk?

2006-09-24 Thread Dinesh Nair
On 09/22/06 15:04 Olle E Johansson said the following: The will be a Video developer's meeting in France in november and I foresee a Asterisk SIP developer's meeting later on to focus on the Asterisk SIP implementation. olle, let me know about this when plans firm up. i'd like to attend th

Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about hup_handler & deadlocks

2006-09-24 Thread Jay Hoover
Ok, I'll go figure out why I'm getting so many SIGHUP. These are coming in at a pretty steady clip on our production machines, several times an hour. There's probably an unrelated bug somewhere causing this.As for the deadlock, I agree with Nic that the issue in hup_hanlder should probably get addr

Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about hup_handler & deadlocks

2006-09-24 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Sunday 24 September 2006 12:58, Jay Hoover wrote: > Thanks, that makes sense. One thing that I don't understand is what > situations in normal Asterisk operation would cause a SIGHUP to get > sent to the daemon. I'm getting a lot of these deadlocks, and I'm > suspicious that there is a problem s

Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about hup_handler & deadlocks

2006-09-24 Thread Nic Bellamy
Jay Hoover wrote: I'm currently investigating a deadlock we're experiencing under high load in Asterisk and I have a question about hup_handler. I don't yet have enough information on this or a good enough repro to write up a report, but it appears to be a deadlock caused by hup_handler callin

Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about hup_handler & deadlocks

2006-09-24 Thread Jay Hoover
Thanks, that makes sense. One thing that I don't understand is what situations in normal Asterisk operation would cause a SIGHUP to get sent to the daemon. I'm getting a lot of these deadlocks, and I'm suspicious that there is a problem somewhere else causing me to get an abnormal volume of SIGHUPs