Re: [asterisk-dev] Jitter Buffer

2006-10-24 Thread Pavel Jezek
John Lange wrote: Specifically, callers trying to record their voicemail greetings will have jittered audio. Setting jbenable=yes in zaptel.conf in order to dejitter sip audio is very confusing and I know there will be a _lot_ of people wondering about this besides me. I strongly agree wit

[asterisk-dev] How to busy out PRI channels?

2006-10-24 Thread Tony Mountifield
I want to create a CLI or Manager command to busy and un-busy channels in a PRI trunk, without actually making real calls. Does chan_zap have any API functions that I can call to do this, or do I need to create some new functionality? How about libpri? The objective is that a busied-out channel (

Re: [asterisk-dev] Jitter Buffer

2006-10-24 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 11:08, John Lange wrote: > jbenable=yes in sip.conf should tell Asterisk to dejitter incoming audio > FROM SIP channels when the receiving leg can not handle dejitter on its > own. > One simple example demonstrates why this makes sense; in the case where > the sip channe

Re: [asterisk-dev] Potential change to outgoing codec offers (new topic)

2006-10-24 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:28:57AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Whatever we do, we will not offer formats to the second endpoint that > were not chosen during negotiation with the first endpoint. We don't > want the call to be setup using direct media and a format which we > cannot support shou

Re: [asterisk-dev] Jitter Buffer

2006-10-24 Thread John Lange
Thanks for the clarification Slav. I appreciate the work you've done on this. A decent JB is very important. So, the bottom line is you set jbenable=yes on channels you want to send dejittered audio too. In most cases this would be any channel which can not handle its own dejitter such as Zap chan

[asterisk-dev] Developers Summit Conference Call

2006-10-24 Thread Jeremy McNamara
If you want to listen into the Developers Summit meeting at Astricon you can call 972-961-7666 or IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/4569. Jeremy McNamara ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or upd

Re: [asterisk-dev] threading

2006-10-24 Thread Moises Silva
I've a question. Does asterisk use threading when execute application? I mean whether all applications are duplicated for each user in memory (which are registered as ast_register_application). And how many users can asterisk supply at one time usually? Asterisk use one thread for each channel ex

[asterisk-dev] asterisk 1.4 problem with call queues

2006-10-24 Thread Dean Bath
Hi,   I’m posting here as I have found an issue in 1.4, and hoping someone might be able to help.   I have setup a call queue in asterisk, a call comes into the queue, asterisk calls the agents, an agent answers the call fine, but if they try and transfer the call, asterisk drops out wi

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: https support now in trunk (please read)

2006-10-24 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 07:25 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > yes there is no fopencookie manpage, but the call is present e.g. on > > the linux box where you gave me an account, and where i actually > > tested that the code was correctly handling https. > > You can try for yo

Re: [asterisk-dev] Potential change to outgoing codec offers (new topic)

2006-10-24 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Brian Candler wrote: > 3. Revert to 1.2 behaviour (i.e. offer all codecs with media proxying, and > re-INVITE to set up native bridging afterwards). However, re-order the codec > list so that the codecs included in the incoming SIP INVITE appear before > the others. This might make it a bit more li

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: https support now in trunk (please read)

2006-10-24 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > yes there is no fopencookie manpage, but the call is present e.g. on > the linux box where you gave me an account, and where i actually > tested that the code was correctly handling https. > You can try for yourself. > > Note that fopencookie(), as well as funopen(), has no re

[asterisk-dev] Re: deadlock in ast_custom_function_register?

2006-10-24 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yuan Qin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, all: > > Asterisk1.2.10, in pbx.c, the ast_custom_function_register is > > int ast_custom_function_register(struct ast_custom_function *acf) > { > if (!acf) > return -1; > > /* try to lock function

Re: [asterisk-dev] Potential change to outgoing codec offers (new topic)

2006-10-24 Thread Brian Candler
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:47:56PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > (However, I have no idea what these devices would do if you completed the > > call, and then they had to use the 'WIBBLE' codec to send audio...) > > I don't think that my proposal is practical; instead, what I am going to > do

[asterisk-dev] deadlock in ast_custom_function_register?

2006-10-24 Thread Yuan Qin
Hi, all: Asterisk1.2.10,  in pbx.c, the ast_custom_function_register isint ast_custom_function_register(struct ast_custom_function *acf) {    if (!acf)        return -1;    /* try to lock functions list ... */     if (ast_mutex_lock(&acflock)) {        ast_log(LOG_ERROR, "Unable to lock functio

Re: [asterisk-dev] Potential change to outgoing codec offers (new topic)

2006-10-24 Thread Brian Candler
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: > Here's one I knocked together in Perl: > http://pobox.com/~b.candler/software/testsiperror > > The fake codec it offers is "WIBBLE/8000". > > And the results I get when pointing it at various SIP UAs: > > Audiocodes Tulip ATA (2.