Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames readfromchan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Moises Silva
Hum, it seems to work with slinear, ulaw, alaw and gsm, but not with iLBC, it complains about ilbc frame not being multiple of 50, so i tried to make it happy, but still misses some translations from slinear to iLBC and the sound is choppy. What makes iLBC so special any way? I just did this to

Re: [asterisk-dev] Clearing pick-up groups on Zap/ channels

2006-11-06 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
Why not allow group= or make group 0 mean "no group". What I do is set channels that I don't want in a group to be group 0 and never use g0 anywhere Nic Bellamy wrote: Olle E Johansson wrote: 5 nov 2006 kl. 16.43 skrev Gil Kloepfer: I've discovered that in configuration files such as the

Re: [asterisk-dev] IAX2 still broken

2006-11-06 Thread Loic DIDELOT
Hi guys, I have been in contact with Digium last week and provided access to our servers etc The latest commits to 1.4 really remove the deadlock. Now there is another bug. After some IAX registrations, asterisk will crash. It does not matter if you use odbc or mysql. The solution is to set "

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames readfromchan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Moises Silva
On 11/6/06, Dan Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the scenario that Moises described, it sounds like he might managed the server that the SPA is registered to. If he had the ability to force the framing between the two servers to 20ms, it would have helped. It would not help if an endpoint t

Re: [asterisk-dev] delayed responses from -dev list ?

2006-11-06 Thread Russell Bryant
Luigi Rizzo wrote: don't know if it is just me or it is a common thing, but i am receiving replies to the -dev list with a delay between 30 and 60 minutes (i can tell because i see them on the web interface, and my own postings appear there right away). Do others experience the same delay ? Ye

Re: [asterisk-dev] TLS/SSL futures

2006-11-06 Thread Scott Gifford
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Other than playing tricks with the linker (to replace the > system read/write/recv... with our own tls-aware routines), > the other approach would be, for encrypted sockets, to > pass the data to an intermediate thread which does the > encrypted I/O

Re: [asterisk-dev] TLS/SSL futures

2006-11-06 Thread Michiel van Baak
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Luigi Rizzo wrote: iksemel is third party software that uses whatever its authors decided to use, and i don't think anyone has the interest of rewriting it to use openssl. Actually, that's not correct. Due to various other issues, Matt

RE: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames readfromchan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Dan Austin
Tilghman wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 12:36, Dan Austin wrote: >> 'Fixing' app_conference is a worthy endevour, but convincing >> chan_iax to honor framing limits on both the send and receive >> legs of a channel would be a big win. Even better would be >> the addition of an IE to convey th

Re: [asterisk-dev] Why -lnsl in IKSEMEL_LIB ?

2006-11-06 Thread Matt O'Gorman
the encryption tools are only needed if you want a secure connection between asterisk and the jabber server. Mog - Original Message - From: Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List Sent: Monday, November 6, 2006 3:58:11 PM GMT-0600 US/Central Subject: [asteris

[asterisk-dev] delayed responses from -dev list ?

2006-11-06 Thread Luigi Rizzo
don't know if it is just me or it is a common thing, but i am receiving replies to the -dev list with a delay between 30 and 60 minutes (i can tell because i see them on the web interface, and my own postings appear there right away). Do others experience the same delay ? cheers l

Re: [asterisk-dev] Clearing pick-up groups on Zap/ channels

2006-11-06 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:17:18AM +1300, Nic Bellamy wrote: > Olle E Johansson wrote: > > > > >5 nov 2006 kl. 16.43 skrev Gil Kloepfer: > > > >>I've discovered that in configuration files such as the one for > >>chan_zap (where all the options "cascade down" rather than being > >>specific for eac

Re: [asterisk-dev] TLS/SSL futures

2006-11-06 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:21:59PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > iksemel is third party software that uses whatever its authors > > decided to use, and i don't think anyone has the interest of rewriting > > it to use openssl. > > Actually, that's not correct. Due to va

Re: [asterisk-dev] aclocal.m4 ???

2006-11-06 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:16:45PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > after this commit acloca.m4e went up from one line to over 6200: > > > > http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/trunk/aclocal.m4?rev=46846&view=log > > > > surely there must be a more compact way to figure out

Re: [asterisk-dev] aclocal.m4 ???

2006-11-06 Thread Russell Bryant
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: However, it appears that using macro brought in _all_ of the libtool-related macros. Probably we can just copy AC_PROG_LD_GNU and its sub-macros directly into acinclude.m4 instead, and not bring in all the other libtool stuff. Yeah, sorry about that. This is just what h

Re: [asterisk-dev] repost: fixes to zaptel makefile

2006-11-06 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:41:29PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > One simple source for the list of modules to build: MOD_LIST > > * A simple name: a module in the current directory > > * A name that ends with '/': a subdirectory. So far only > > works for kernel 2.6

[asterisk-dev] Why -lnsl in IKSEMEL_LIB ?

2006-11-06 Thread Luigi Rizzo
we have this block in configure.ac: AST_EXT_LIB_CHECK([IKSEMEL], [iksemel], [iks_start_sasl], [iksemel.h]) if test "${PBX_IKSEMEL}" = 1; then AST_EXT_LIB_CHECK([GNUTLS], [gnutls], [gnutls_bye]) if test "${PBX_GNUTLS}" = 1; then IKSEMEL_LIB="${I

Re: [asterisk-dev] Clearing pick-up groups on Zap/ channels

2006-11-06 Thread Rod Dorman
On Monday, November 6, 2006, 15:17:18, Nic Bellamy wrote: > ... > I've been trying to think of an easy, minimal-change way out of the > zapata.conf inheritence problem (since it's not just pickupgroups that > have this behaviour, it's just worse with that since you can't reset it > at present).

Re: [asterisk-dev] aclocal.m4 ???

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > after this commit acloca.m4e went up from one line to over 6200: > > http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/trunk/aclocal.m4?rev=46846&view=log > > surely there must be a more compact way to figure out whether we > are using gnu-ld or something else ? This macro is what GNU lib

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: [asterisk-commits] oej: trunk r47194 - /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > i asked this specific change on the list, we discussed a bit on how > i thought it was useful. i did not see any explaination from you > (or others, if it matters) on why you consider this code harmful. We don't reject things ONLY because they might be harmful. We also have t

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames read fromchan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:36, Dan Austin wrote: > 'Fixing' app_conference is a worthy endevour, but convincing > chan_iax to honor framing limits on both the send and receive > legs of a channel would be a big win. Even better would be > the addition of an IE to convey the desired framing/payl

Re: [asterisk-dev] repost: fixes to zaptel makefile

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > * 'make all' should not depend on the menuselect target. Why not? We will decide which utilities to build based on the dependency information found by the configure script, which menuselect then turns into target information for the Makefile. > * menuselect should be run m

Re: [asterisk-dev] Clearing pick-up groups on Zap/ channels

2006-11-06 Thread Nic Bellamy
Olle E Johansson wrote: 5 nov 2006 kl. 16.43 skrev Gil Kloepfer: I've discovered that in configuration files such as the one for chan_zap (where all the options "cascade down" rather than being specific for each category, there is no way to indicate that channels have no pick-up group after t

RE: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames read fromchan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Dan Austin
Tilghman wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 09:12, Moises Silva wrote: >>Well, now knowing the fundamental cause, im going to the hardest >> part, finding a solution for the issue on app_conference code, I dont >> think is a good idea rely on 20ms frames. Or is it possible to make >> Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] setting the q.931 "reason for redirecting"?

2006-11-06 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
how can I set the "reason for redirecting" as defined in Q.931 4.6.7 Redirecting number? While redirecting some calls, telco says "you need to set reason for redirecting to 0 0 1 0Call forwarding no reply. I can find code related to this in libpri, but no app to interface with this in a

[asterisk-dev] Subversion repository maintenance and upgrades are completed

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
After many (many) hours of work, I have completed a significant upgrade to our Subversion infrastructure. First, our Subversion servers are now running Subversion 1.4.0, and all the repositories have been upgraded to the new 1.4 higher-compression format. This will results in faster checkouts, upd

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames read from chan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Moises Silva
On 11/6/06, Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One could use the ast_smoother interface. It was designed specifically to take frames of variant sizes and produce frames of a single expected size, precisely what you want to do. The basic interface is: Initialize with ast_smoother_new(),

Re: [asterisk-dev] setting the q.931 "reason for redirecting"?

2006-11-06 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Hi To answer this myself, setting PRIREDIRECTREASON is not supported in 1.2, but is/will be in 1.4. I took a look at the code, as to check if backporting it looks hard, and it doesn't. however, something is wrong so my code can't get what PRIREDIRECTREASON was set to. Can someone give me

Re: [asterisk-dev] setting the q.931 "reason for redirecting"?

2006-11-06 Thread Kai Ober
not sure if i got everything right, try : SET (PRI_CAUSE=22) HANGUP() in asterisk src dir is a file countaining the pri couses grep for _ASTERISK_CAUSES_H Regards KAI BTW ist's a asterisk-user question and not a -dev!! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk schrieb: hi all how can I set the "reason for re

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames read from chan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Monday 06 November 2006 09:12, Moises Silva wrote: >Well, now knowing the fundamental cause, im going to the hardest > part, finding a solution for the issue on app_conference code, I dont > think is a good idea rely on 20ms frames. Or is it possible to make > Asterisk use only 20ms frames?

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Help with 240 samples on frames read from chan_iax

2006-11-06 Thread Moises Silva
Dan Austin: Thanks for your suggestion, on one side of the link im using Asterisk-1.2.1, in the app_conference side im using Asterisk-1.2.12.1. But it seems that is not relevant. You were right, the Linksys SPA im using sends 30ms RTP packetization, using a grandstream phone made it work. Tony:

[asterisk-dev] setting the q.931 "reason for redirecting"?

2006-11-06 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
hi all how can I set the "reason for redirecting" as defined in Q.931 4.6.7 Redirecting number? While redirecting some calls, telco says "you need to set reason for redirecting to 0 0 1 0 Call forwarding no reply. I can find code related to this in libpri, but no app to interface with thi

Re: [asterisk-dev] TLS/SSL futures

2006-11-06 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:59:41PM +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote: > Friends, > We're in SSL/TLS hell and need a strategy to get to SSL/TLS heaven, > if it exists ;-) > > Currently we have many different implementations: > > * John Todd's SSL for manager API in the bug tracker (OpenSSL) > * The

Re: [asterisk-dev] Clearing pick-up groups on Zap/ channels

2006-11-06 Thread Olle E Johansson
5 nov 2006 kl. 16.43 skrev Gil Kloepfer: I've discovered that in configuration files such as the one for chan_zap (where all the options "cascade down" rather than being specific for each category, there is no way to indicate that channels have no pick-up group after the first group has been se