On Sunday 03 December 2006 22:43, Lucas Barbuto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested in adding "withdrawal codes" or "not ready reasons" to
> the Asterisk™ ACD system. That is, when an agent elects to go on
> pause, they can/must first select a reason for that pause.
>
> I was able to make a few sm
Tim Panton wrote:
On 3 Dec 2006, at 21:11, Derek Smithies wrote:
Hi, On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Markku Korpi wrote:
Derek Smithies wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Di-Shi Sun wrote:>
The third option could be to add a segmentation procedure in a
similar way as they are used
On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:43, Lucas Barbuto wrote:
> I didn't do a careful job, but it worked as a proof-of-concept. I'd
> appreciate it if anyone could suggest if I'm going about this in a
> reasonable way and if it's a feature that might likely be accepted
> for merging into the 1.12 branch.
Hi all,
I'm interested in adding "withdrawal codes" or "not ready reasons" to
the Asterisk™ ACD system. That is, when an agent elects to go on
pause, they can/must first select a reason for that pause.
I was able to make a few small changes to app_queue.c and logger.c in
1.12.13 which en
Here's the most current draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-guy-iax-02.txt
Mihai
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:14 PM, rahul sharma wrote:
Hi
I had written before also but it was not fruit
ful.Can you tell me where to look for details on IAX2.
A complete draft with proper state diagrams.
Hi
I had written before also but it was not fruit
ful.Can you tell me where to look for details on IAX2.
A complete draft with proper state diagrams.
regards
rahul
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:51, Tim Panton wrote:
But Kevin's point still applies, IAX doesn't support multiple instances of
the same IE type in a message.
Is that by spec or by implementation? If by spec, then my IAX2 vars
implementation was a big "Oops" on my part.
I have just uploaded a new patch to implement the Bridge application
and manager action, can somebody please take a look at it and
hopefully make some tests? This bug/feature request has been there for
ages, im willing to have it in trunk.
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5841
Kind Regards
--
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:51, Tim Panton wrote:
> But Kevin's point still applies, IAX doesn't support multiple instances of
> the same IE type in a message.
Is that by spec or by implementation? If by spec, then my IAX2 vars
implementation was a big "Oops" on my part.
--
Tilghman
_
On 3 Dec 2006, at 21:11, Derek Smithies wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Markku Korpi wrote:
Derek Smithies wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Di-Shi Sun wrote:>
The third option could be to add a segmentation procedure in a
similar way as
they are used e.g. in SS7 ISUP an
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Markku Korpi wrote:
> Derek Smithies wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> > > Di-Shi Sun wrote:>
>
> The third option could be to add a segmentation procedure in a similar way as
> they are used e.g. in SS7 ISUP and Q.931. In this case we would need to
erm
forget about that last reply.
wrong answer :P
On 2. des. 2006, at 09.50, Paul Cadach wrote:
Hello,
This is probably because of mis-configuration of your PRI zap span
(wrong switchtype, etc.). Which version of
asterisk/libpri do you use?
WBR,
Paul.
- Original Message -
From:
this was not because of that, but because rdnis is write-only in 1.2.
this fixed it:
roy
Index: channels/chan_zap.c
===
--- channels/chan_zap.c (revision 333)
+++ channels/chan_zap.c (working copy)
@@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@
On Saturday 02 December 2006 23:03, Peter Beckman wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:16, Peter Beckman wrote:
> >> Is there a formal definitions of the verbosity levels and what is
> >> appropriate at each level?
> >
> > There is not, but gen
14 matches
Mail list logo
