[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: file
> Date: Fri Jan 12 21:26:04 2007
> New Revision: 50676
>
> URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=50676
> Log:
> Merge in trunkrealloc option for chan_iax2. (issue #8267 reported by
> marcodmb, branch by anthonyl)
Wouldn't it be clearer (and
TRIM YOUR REPLIES TO JUST THE MINIMUM NEEDED
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:39 -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Dear Jared;
>
> Who create the Makefile? Is it coming after I do the make command or it will
> be existed after extracting the tar.gz files?
>
> Regards
> Bilal
--
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL
At 8:27 AM -0600 2007/1/12, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
John Todd wrote:
While I understand the sentiment here, I'm not sure this is a good
idea. This builds in a 500ms post-dial delay issue into every call.
I've been building systems for three years now, and everywhere there is
an "Answer" (wh
Dear Jared;
Who create the Makefile? Is it coming after I do the make command or it will be
existed after extracting the tar.gz files?
Regards
Bilal
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:41:14
hi guys,
I was wondering if there's any work in progress to port the RFC2705 in
asterisk.
I mean, something that will translate any digits maps string in a pattern
way that Asterisk will understand (NXZ and [foo-bar]).
If none, let me so I can start work on something related to that.
Imagine thi
Dear Jared;
I see from your answer three kernels:
1) Zaptel kernel drivers.
2) kernel sources.
3) Linux 2.4 kernel.
Really I would like to know if I can access any of these kernels to see it
(read it) and based on what the system build a kernel? Is it a virtual thing?
Please advise.
Regards
B
On 1/12/07, Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that the Answer() argument was also mis-documented; it was already
a post-answer delay, and I've updated all three branches to reflect that.
I thought it was, but then I went back and looked at the documentation
and it said "before",
Jared Smith wrote:
> Wouldn't this be better served as an argument to the Answer()
> application? We already have one argument for a delay *before*
> answering the channel, so why not have one for a delay *after*
> answering the channel. Now the commit log says "when a channel gets
> automaticall
On 1/12/07, John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I understand the sentiment here, I'm not sure this is a good
idea. This builds in a 500ms post-dial delay issue into every call.
I've been building systems for three years now, and everywhere there
is an "Answer" (which, I believe, should be
John Todd wrote:
> While I understand the sentiment here, I'm not sure this is a good
> idea. This builds in a 500ms post-dial delay issue into every call.
> I've been building systems for three years now, and everywhere there is
> an "Answer" (which, I believe, should be the only method that pick
On Friday 12 January 2007 02:29, Ian Hailey wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> >On Thursday 11 January 2007 04:25, Ian Hailey wrote:
> >>I have created a new codec (i.e. codec_xxx.so) for Asterisk and would
> >>like to know if I need to also create a new format module (i.e.
> >>format_xxx.so) suppor
I've run into a little problem using realtime queues, and want to make a
proposal / suggestion / comment ;)
With what I can see with realtime, the columns in the table are matched
to the options in the corresponding .conf file. for example:
queues.conf: retry=5
realtime: sometable.retry conta
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:35:19PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
> svn-commits@lists.digium.com wrote:
> >Author: file
> >Date: Thu Jan 11 11:07:38 2007
> >New Revision: 1807
> >
> >URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel?view=rev&rev=1807
> >Log:
> >Return what I took away (fcstab) since it's actual
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Faruk Kasumovic wrote:
I'm trying to do following:
I want to link asterisk queue with analog PBX in fashion that all
incoming calls will be transfered from queue using flash/recall so
zaptel channel is free after that. And I made it, but what if number
I flush to is b
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 04:25, Ian Hailey wrote:
I have created a new codec (i.e. codec_xxx.so) for Asterisk and would
like to know if I need to also create a new format module (i.e.
format_xxx.so) supporting the new format? Do the format_xxx.so modules
just provid
15 matches
Mail list logo
