---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3093/#review10512
---
i have found a bug but i am not sure if this only depends on
On 02 Jan 2014, at 20:06, SVN commits to the Digium repositories
svn-comm...@lists.digium.com wrote:
res_pjsip: add 'set_var' support on endpoints
Coming in late...
In sip.conf, skinny.conf and other places, it's setvar without underscore.
Why change the syntax already used?
/O
--
On Jan. 3, 2014, 9:24 a.m., schmidts wrote:
i have found a bug but i am not sure if this only depends on this patch or
on pjsip itself. I have a subscribe sipp scenario which works fine with
chan_sip but broke down pjsip completly. i have found that in my scenario i
have a wrong
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
On 02 Jan 2014, at 20:06, SVN commits to the Digium repositories
svn-comm...@lists.digium.com wrote:
res_pjsip: add 'set_var' support on endpoints
Coming in late...
In sip.conf, skinny.conf and other places, it's
On 03 Jan 2014, at 16:50, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
In sip.conf, skinny.conf and other places, it's setvar without underscore.
Why change the syntax already used?
Hey Olle -
The syntax here is strictly snake case for two reasons:
(1) It keeps it in line with the
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
On 03 Jan 2014, at 16:50, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
In sip.conf, skinny.conf and other places, it's setvar without underscore.
Why change the syntax already used?
Hey Olle -
The syntax here is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3089/#review10515
---
So...I just don't really like this.
1) Making a macro like
On Jan. 3, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
So...I just don't really like this.
1) Making a macro like this makes the code more esoteric than it previously
was.
2) The fact that the loop_obj has to be NULLed out before breaking or
returning from the loop if no reference
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3098/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2014, 12:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3101/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23084
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3089/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2014, 1:15 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3101/#review10517
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Paul Belanger
On Jan. 3, 2014, 7:14
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3061/#review10518
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Dec. 20, 2013, 4:37
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3093/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2014, 8:18 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Hello everybody,
I'm trying writing an app for transmit an FSK message over the line.
I'm having troubles basically because I have no idea of how a voice frame
should be sent using asterisk's api.
If I use this piece of code toward a phone, I can indeed hear the FSK tone.
But if I send it to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
