Hello. I use PJSIP as channel for my clients and CHAN_SIP as channel for my
proiders.
I user chan_sip because I can not find any analog of insecure option at
PJSIP. Does IT have this analog of this function. This is critical question
because CNAH_SIP have a memory leak that crushes my system:
On 28 Aug 2014, at 23:53, SVN commits to the Digium repositories
svn-comm...@lists.digium.com wrote:
This patch updates the LICENSE text to allow users to link Asterisk with
UniMRCP and distribute the resulting binaries.
Thank you! Good decision.
/O
--
Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Hello. I use PJSIP as channel for my clients and CHAN_SIP as channel for
my proiders.
I user chan_sip because I can not find any analog of insecure option at
PJSIP. Does IT have this analog of this function.
Kia ora,
Yes, but it is not grouped with endpoints. It is a
The last hurdle for me to adopt pjsip has been what to do with phoneprov
and now that chan_sip has been moved to extended support, this has come to
the front burner. I've been thinking of ways to make the existing
res_phoneprov configurable to use either the existing users.conf/sip.conf
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3953/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 1:46 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3858/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3872/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3896/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3895/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Aug. 25, 2014, 2:43 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/ari/resource_bridges.c, lines 425-431
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/diff/1/?file=66745#file66745line425
Remove. This is redundant and too late anyway. The announcer role is
already added to the ;2 channel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 3:15 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/#review13203
---
/branches/12/res/ari/resource_bridges.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3955/#review13204
---
branches/12/apps/app_confbridge.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3955/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 4:27 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3958/#review13205
---
Ship it!
This applies to v1.8+
- rmudgett
On Aug. 28,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3955/#review13206
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- rmudgett
On Aug. 29, 2014, 5:27 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3948/#review13207
---
Thanks for all that info Matt. In answer to the question how
On Aug. 29, 2014, 3:52 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/stasis/stasis_bridge.c, lines 137-139
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/diff/2/?file=66975#file66975line137
Since ARI can set a channel's role as holding_participant but currently
cannot set options on a role,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 7:31 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Aug. 29, 2014, 3:52 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/stasis/stasis_bridge.c, line 140
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/diff/2/?file=66975#file66975line140
Optional nit: Extra blank line :)
Well, that extra blank line was there to prevent the conditional clauses in
On Aug. 29, 2014, 3:52 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/stasis/stasis_bridge.c, line 140
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/diff/2/?file=66975#file66975line140
Optional nit: Extra blank line :)
Matt Jordan wrote:
Well, that extra blank line was there to prevent
On Aug. 29, 2014, 3:52 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/stasis/stasis_bridge.c, line 140
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3929/diff/2/?file=66975#file66975line140
Optional nit: Extra blank line :)
Matt Jordan wrote:
Well, that extra blank line was there to prevent
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3963/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24254
I have a crash here:
(gdb) bt
#0 ast_hashtab_hash_string (obj=0x144) at hashtab.c:166
#1 0x005937d2 in cache_entry_compute_hash (cache=0x2b70870,
type=value optimized out, id=0x144 Address 0x144 out of bounds) at
stasis_cache.c:180
#2 cache_find (cache=0x2b70870, type=value
24 matches
Mail list logo
