Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4264: PJSIP: Update transport method documentation

2014-12-29 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4264/ --- (Updated Dec. 29, 2014, 7:11 a.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: [asterisk-dev] git migration update

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the update. > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 01:03:17PM -0600, Samuel Galarneau wrote: > > Just wanted to update everyone on the git migration status and illicit some > > feedback on a few items. > > > > We setup an instance o

Re: [asterisk-dev] git migration update

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> >> >> You are missing one thing. When committing to the current team branches, >> the code is contributed under the license agreement. >> >> The code in my branches is available f

Re: [asterisk-dev] Adding the support for NACK in asterisk

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Nitesh Bansal wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for this nice explanation. > > Well, we still don't know if we are going to do it or not, it is still a > pending decision. > > But i do have some comments ref your response, responding inline. > > General comment: By ad

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4272: Testsuite: Verify that bridged channels originated into Stasis and AMI Redirect interoperate properly

2014-12-29 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4272/ --- (Updated Dec. 29, 2014, 10:17 a.m.) Review request for Asterisk Developers

Re: [asterisk-dev] asterisknow-version

2014-12-29 Thread Leif Madsen
On 27 December 2014 at 19:15, Matthew Jordan wrote: > If that doesn't work for you, I'd suggest making your own packages. > > This is what we've ended up doing. I took the SRPM file from the Fedora repository and hacked the SPEC[1] file to suit my own needs. It only builds what I need now, and do

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:13 PM, George Joseph wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Jordan > wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> > Currently within PJSIP there is no mechanism for the dialplan to examine >> > things at an AOR or contact level. T

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread George Joseph
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:13 PM, George Joseph < > george.jos...@fairview5.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Jordan >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >>> > Currently

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread Joshua Colp
Matthew Jordan wrote: If we have to define multiple endpoint definitions, then the usefulness of having multiple contacts bound to an AoR diminishes substantially. It may be that people are confusing the concept of a device with that of a user profile - but if that's the case, then I'm not su

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:12 AM, George Joseph wrote: > In basic scenarios, however, we do have a match between the inbound >> Contact header in the INVITE request and what was provided by that device's >> REGISTER request. >> >> It is possible, however, to not require Asterisk to make this d

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > > >> If we have to define multiple endpoint definitions, then the usefulness >> of having multiple contacts bound to an AoR diminishes substantially. It >> may be that people are confusing the concept of a device

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > >> Matthew Jordan wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> If we have to define multiple endpoint definitions, then the usefulness >>> of having multiple contacts bound to an AoR diminishes substa

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP_AOR and PJSIP_CONTACT Dialplan Functions

2014-12-29 Thread George Joseph
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > >> Matthew Jordan wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> If we have to define multiple endpoint definitions, then the usefulness >>> of having multiple contacts bound to an AoR diminishes substa

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4300: bridge_native_rtp: Change local/remote message from debug/2 to verb/4

2014-12-29 Thread George Joseph
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4300/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk Description

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4300: bridge_native_rtp: Change local/remote message from debug/2 to verb/4

2014-12-29 Thread Joshua Colp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4300/#review14046 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joshua Colp On Dec. 29, 2014, 11:09 p.m

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4301: res_pjsip_outbound_registration: Add 'pjsip send register' command and update behavior of 'send unregister'

2014-12-29 Thread George Joseph
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4301/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk Description