---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4419/#review14486
---
/branches/11/channels/sip/sdp_crypto.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4420/#review14489
---
Comments regarding recommended test cases for the chan_sip
On Feb. 18, 2015, 7:57 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/branches/11/channels/sip/sdp_crypto.c, line 304
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4419/diff/1/?file=71388#file71388line304
Since we're only concerned about an integer value here, would the
following work:
On Feb. 18, 2015, 8:58 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/sip_srtp/srtp_sdp_offer_answer/sipp/srtp-invite-double-crypto.xml,
line 49
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4420/diff/1/?file=71426#file71426line49
The regex being used here has some issues.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4431/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4431/#review14492
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Moises Silva
On Feb. 18, 2015, 10:32
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Nitesh Bansal nitesh.ban...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Matt,
It seems that my reply was lost in the pile of mails during holiday
period?
Is there any update on this?
Regards,
Nitesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4425/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2015, 7:59 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Nitesh Bansal nitesh.ban...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Matt,
It seems that my reply was lost in the pile of mails during holiday period?
Is there any update on this?
Regards,
Nitesh
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Nitesh Bansal nitesh.ban...@gmail.com
wrote:
