On March 9, 2015, 1:19 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/13/main/utils.c, line 614
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4463/diff/2/?file=71877#file71877line614
This looks like it should be applied to 11 as well.
I'd go so far as to say that bug fixes as a result of this should be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4463/#review14610
---
Do you plan on other chaotic things? As it is the chaos is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4438/
---
(Updated March 9, 2015, 2:12 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4460/#review14611
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On March 6, 2015, 11:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4463/#review14613
---
/branches/13/include/asterisk/utils.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4456/#review14612
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On March 5, 2015, 11:34
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4455/
---
(Updated March 9, 2015, 11:12 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hey all -
So, this last week I was travelling, and since flights are always a
good time to write some code, I decided to play around with an idea
that had been sitting in the back of my head for a little bit:
clustering the Asterisk Database. I got the notion after looking at
Kamailio's htable
On March 9, 2015, 8:19 a.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/13/main/utils.c, line 614
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4463/diff/2/?file=71877#file71877line614
This looks like it should be applied to 11 as well.
Joshua Colp wrote:
I'd go so far as to say that bug fixes as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4456/
---
(Updated March 9, 2015, 11:47 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On March 9, 2015, 7:41 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
Do you plan on other chaotic things? As it is the chaos is really just
memory allocation failures, nothing outside the scope of that.
Yes -- the idea is that chaos could be easily inserted into any function that
has a specific failure
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4464/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4468/
---
(Updated March 9, 2015, 3:50 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
While browsing some pcap captures of IAX channel, I found many LAGRQ and
LAGRP packets (once per 10 seconds for each call).
So, I traced LAGRQ and LAGRP use in code and found that it is almost
useless; it sets iaxs[fr-callno]-lag which is not used anywhere else.
Almost same functionality
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4468/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4460/#review14617
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ashley Sanders
On March 6, 2015, 5:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4467/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24807
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4463/#review14619
---
/branches/13/include/asterisk/utils.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4468/#review14618
---
/branches/13/main/config.c
Cool, too bad it isn't documented. I'll add it into PHPARI as well.
On Mar 8, 2015 6:18 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Nir Simionovich
nir.simionov...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I'll have a look into that one.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Olle
On 09 Mar 2015, at 08:54, Nir Simionovich nir.simionov...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, too bad it isn't documented. I'll add it into PHPARI as well.
I believe that this was one of the reasons we created the support for _VARIABLE
and __VARIABLE
in Asterisk. The ability to reach over to the new
On 08 Mar 2015, at 17:17, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
You should be able to do it with just the channel variable SIPADDHEADER,
that is:
SIPADDHEADER=X-CustomHeader-1: foo
SIPADDHEADER=X-CustomHeader-2: bar
I think there's a serial number in the name of the variable.
/O--
23 matches
Mail list logo
