Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk Docker Containers: Phase 1

2015-11-24 Thread Corey Farrell
I make use of a couple patches so the latest Fedora spec is a good enough base for me. If other people want to see current binaries for EPEL hopefully they'll speak up. I had a chance to look over the asterisk.spec from Fedora master, I have a couple comments. * res_ari_mailboxes.so should be

[asterisk-dev] Asterisk Docker Containers: Phase 1

2015-11-24 Thread Corey Farrell
Leif, Thanks for explaining I should have read your blog post before replying to Jared's email about the RPM's. I didn't realize EPEL was that strict with version freezes to stay with a no longer supported version. I do not know too much about Docker yet but I took a look anyways. Can

[asterisk-dev] Transcoding: Codec 2, iLBC 20, SILK, GSM-EFR, AMR(-WB)

2015-11-24 Thread Alexander Traud
Thanks to the codec/format changes which were introduced with Asterisk 13, adding new trancoding modules is possible within one working day. Thanks to format-attribute modules, the debugging of the SDP/fmtp-negotiation resides in one source file. Therefore, I was able to port five formats to

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk Docker Containers: Phase 1

2015-11-24 Thread Jared Smith
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Leif Madsen wrote: > The way it works is that major versions of Asterisk (and same with other > packages) are associated with specific releases of Fedora and RHEL, which > means the major versions are "stuck" to those releases. If it's