On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Michael Petruzzello <
michael.petruzze...@civi.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jonathan Rose motorolasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> > If you don't need all of your participants actually to be speaking at a
> > time (and I hope not with that kind of volume)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jonathan Rose wrote:
> If you don't need all of your participants actually to be speaking at a
> time (and I hope not with that kind of volume), you could use holding
> bridges for the vast majority of the partipants. Link the bridges using a
> local channel with t
Hi All,
I missed some details in my last email, so please ignore that one and
read this one instead. Thank You.
I've written an AMI interface and it's been working for the last few
years. I am currently working on a new feature and came across an issue
where Asterisk stops processing AGI r
Hi All,
I've written an AMI interface and it's been working for the last few
years. I am currently working on a new feature and came across an issue
where Asterisk stops processing AGI requests (issued via AMI), making it
impossible to then even physically hang up a channel (until the next
c