[asterisk-dev] OPUS horrible quality with packet loss

2017-03-31 Thread Yury Tsaregorodtsev
Examples of OPUS with 30% of LOSS with FEC on http://opus-codec.org/examples/ Sounds too perfect. Why I can't achieve even similar quality on asterisk with built codec by digium? To simulate 30% packet loss I use: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms lo

Re: [asterisk-dev] AMI/ARI versioning

2017-03-31 Thread Matt Fredrickson
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Corey Farrell wrote: > On 03/31/2017 10:47 AM, Kevin Harwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Corey Farrell wrote: >> >> On 03/30/2017 07:14 PM, Kevin Harwell wrote: >> I think it's worth referencing a previous discussion on this [1]. > > > Yes, th

[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 14.4.0-rc2 Now Available

2017-03-31 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the second release candidate of Asterisk 14.4.0. This release candidate is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 14.4.0-rc2 resolves an issue reported by the community and would h

[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 13.15.0-rc2 Now Available

2017-03-31 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the second release candidate of Asterisk 13.15.0. This release candidate is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 13.15.0-rc2 resolves an issue reported by the community and would

Re: [asterisk-dev] AMI/ARI versioning

2017-03-31 Thread Corey Farrell
On 03/31/2017 10:47 AM, Kevin Harwell wrote: On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Corey Farrell > wrote: On 03/30/2017 07:14 PM, Kevin Harwell wrote: I think it's worth referencing a previous discussion on this [1]. Yes, thank you! I looked for this and for some

Re: [asterisk-dev] AMI/ARI versioning

2017-03-31 Thread Daniel Journo
I agree with Mark's idea that having the ARI/AMI major version tied to the Asterisk branch could lead to confusion, lead people to believe that ARI 14.3.0 == Asterisk 14.3.0. Is it possible to use letters instead of numbers to avoid confusion? ARI 14.A.1 ? Or use numbers which aren’t Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] AMI/ARI versioning

2017-03-31 Thread Kevin Harwell
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Corey Farrell wrote: > On 03/30/2017 07:14 PM, Kevin Harwell wrote: > I think it's worth referencing a previous discussion on this [1]. > Yes, thank you! I looked for this and for some reason my searches turned up nothing. > I agree with Mark's idea that having