On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:44 AM, bala murugan wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Can anyone tell me if there is a know bug raised and fixed when we handle or
> Parse Contact Header , if it is presented without brackets
>
> I get a INVITE with
> Contact:sip:p65549t000m112562c59100@10.196.0.111:5089;+g.3gpp.a
Thanks George ,
I am using chan_sip
On Jun 7, 2017 5:19 PM, "George Joseph" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:44 AM, bala murugan
> wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if there is a know bug raised and fixed when we
> handle or
> > Parse Contact Header , if it is presented without brack
RFC3261 isn't exactly clear on this. Section 20.10 implies that the
brackets are optional if a display name isn't specified but the ABNF
specified down in section 25.1 implies that they are required always
[Bala] I can see section 20.10 mentioned as optional , but in ABNF section
25.1 i couldnt
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:04 PM, bala murugan wrote:
> RFC3261 isn't exactly clear on this. Section 20.10 implies that the
> brackets are optional if a display name isn't specified but the ABNF
> specified down in section 25.1 implies that they are required always
>
> [Bala] I can see section 20.
