Re: [asterisk-dev] Open Invitation - Open Source VoIP Documentation Project

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nir Simionovich wrote: > Hi All, > > Following Astricon 2017, and my own personal interest in providing the > community with more detailed documentation sources and specifically - best > of practice and how-to documents, I've opened a

Re: [asterisk-dev] Add missing XML tags in pjsip NOTIFY for RFC4235

> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Ludovic Gasc wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Certainly as you, we have more and more phone brands who are capable to >> read the XML from a NOTIFY when a phone rings to extract callerid and show >> that on the screen. >> >> The issue is that it doesn't

Re: [asterisk-dev] autoconf version requirement increase

Le 06/11/2017 à 07:29, Corey Farrell a écrit : > Thank you for pointing this out.  I have submitted a patch for Asterisk > 13, 15 and master so in future versions of Asterisk (13.19.0+ and > 15.2.0+) you will not need to run ./bootstrap.sh to build/install the > open source Opus codec. Great!

Re: [asterisk-dev] Webpage Downloads

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Traud wrote: > > > 2) Test Release: Is it possible to remove the part about test releases > > when the final release is newer? Or link to that final release

Re: [asterisk-dev] autoconf version requirement increase

Thank you for pointing this out.  I have submitted a patch for Asterisk 13, 15 and master so in future versions of Asterisk (13.19.0+ and 15.2.0+) you will not need to run ./bootstrap.sh to build/install the open source Opus codec. On 11/01/2017 04:27 PM, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: Hi list,

Re: [asterisk-dev] Where is pjsip_evsub_set_uas_timeout?

> An earlier approach was to add support for setting pjproject's timer > (via a pjproject patch) and while that patch is still included here, > we don't use that call at the moment." OK, and what do we do with this code now? I am not used to leverage a version-controlled source code as pastebin

Re: [asterisk-dev] Webpage Downloads

> 2) Test Release: Is it possible to remove the part about test releases > when the final release is newer? Or link to that final release instead? > Some users might scroll all the way down and install the "latest" test > release