Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:23 PM Joshua C. Colp wrote: > As a packager and someone who has been in the community and user world, > what's your opinion and thoughts on the 2 year strategy? > I'm fine with it... for faster-moving distributions (such as Fedora), users are used to following new

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

On 2020-10-06 2:22 PM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Jared Smith > wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins mailto:d...@nimblea.pe>> wrote: sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Jared Smith wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins wrote: > >> sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage package >> maintainers to potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a >> thing but as far as I'm concerned most