>From a practical standpoint, this also reduces the cost (effort, time, etc.)
for maintaining security audits.
August is a popular month for exploits to be released. I'm glad were better
prepared.
Cheers,
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps it's not a question of elegant code but rather quality and
maintainability. Once code goes in, those are real issues that take time
and effort.
I've seen technical integrity mistaken for dictatorship many times, and in
the end the users suffer if it is replaced by political solutions. Be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang S Rupprecht
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Wolfgang> Under unix and bsd EAGAIN simply means someone set
> the socket
> Wolfgang> to non-blocking and proceeded to read the socket before any
> Wolfgang>
Yea, that's my first impression as well.
But configuring Apache (which uses XML) isn't so bad.
Plus, it greatly simplifies any protocol for
exchanging configuration data. That leaves the
door open to creating wizards, or other tools
that create or maintain configuration.
Rich
> -Origin
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alastair Maw
>
> Mike Mitchell wrote:
>
> >> How about not requiring any type of timer anymore?
>
>
> On 06/07/04 18:20, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
>
> > Ok Mr. Smart guy, show us how to mix audio without a 1000hz
> interrupt.
I'd be glad to modify whatever I've written to support FreeBSD in order to
take advantage of autoconf. I believe autoconf would make support for *BSD
easier to achieve and easier to maintain.
Just count on me to modify it accordingly if autoconf is integrated.
Although I'd prefer to use autoconf
Wow, thanks very much for catching that.. -- that's a new file that simply
hadn't made it into the repository.
For the moment you can get it as 'queue-h.dif' from here:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001626
patch -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ast
Would Sipura interoperability be an appropriate practical goal for
implementing these as Olle suggested?
Are there any compatible soft phones or service providers to test against
(for those without a Sipura)?
Cheers,
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-d
hansson
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] FreeBSD compile problems (even with new
> changes)
>
> Dr. Rich Murphey wrote:
>
> > If no one else is looking at this I'd be happy to. Asterisk 0.9.0 in
> > Free
Umm.. nevermind, it's easy to see that
PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP is undeclared at compile time. I'll
take a further look
Cheers,
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Rich Murph
Try
http://www.murphey.org/asterisk-CIRCLEQ.diff
Cheers,
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Todd
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] FreeBSD compile proble
11 matches
Mail list logo
