RE: [Asterisk-Dev] code theft again?

Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But since we have granted Digium a license to relicense the code to > other parties, under other licenses, we need Digium to provide notice > that they have not granted such a license before we can reasonably > take action to enforce our rights under the G

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] RE: Welcome to the "Asterisk-Dev" mailing list(Digest mode)

Amar P Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What voice over IP providers are recommended for use with Asterisk and > Degium hardware? I have searched on Google and found Vonage. I want to > setup a voice over IP phone line that rings into the Asterisk box. > VoIP providers will probably not care whet

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk and uClinux

Philip Trauring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm new to the dev list. I tried searching online about running > Asterisk with uClinux and found very little. Is anyone successfully > doing this? Is there some web page that will direct me on how to do > this? I was very surprised that there was nothing

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] PHP vs C

Jeremy McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Matthew Boehm wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I'm getting ready to write a custom least cost routing app for our > > company and wanted to get some pro/con feedback on programming this app > > a) in PHP as an AGI or b) in C as a loadable .so module > > > Use

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] G.723.1 IPP for Asterisk ready for download

> > This code is new and I would appreciate any feedback on the install > process or operational problems. > Well done on the G.729 and G.723.1 codecs. I keep meaning to give them a go, but never seem to get around to it. It's nice to know that they're out there though. Keep up the good work.

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] G729 in non-realtime mode - way forward for Asterisk?

Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If the use of a G729 converter in batch mode for non-realtime is > royalty-free, then this would be a way forward to live happily ever > after with Asterisk in passthrough mode only. > If this usage of G.729 was royalty-free then it wo

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] RE: MYSQL application

Constantine Filin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > While I understand the concern of too many 'vendor' specific > > implementations, I applaud the inclusion of 'query', 'insert', etc. > > commands into the asterisk dialplan versus through an AGI. If the > > general consensus is to move this into ast_d

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] UK Caller ID patch and new CVS

Vassilis Konstantinou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It appears that the new channels/chan_zap.c > has quite a few new lines of code and makes the original UK Caller ID > patch (second patch for the chan_zap file) to fail. > > I tried to find my way through the code but it is getting a bit too > compl

[Asterisk-Dev] RE: [Asterisk-cvs] asterisk/channels chan_zap.c,1.240,1.241

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (in asterisk-cvs): > Update of /usr/cvsroot/asterisk/channels > In directory mongoose.digium.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22203/channels > > Modified Files: > chan_zap.c > Log Message: > Allocate pseudo channel if it's not explicitly listed > > > Index: chan_zap.c > ==

RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Commercial Licensing of Asterisk?

Steven Sokol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How do you plan to use Asterisk? The GPL restricts you from selling the > code, but many people have commercial products that use Asterisk. > The GPL doesn't restrict you from selling the code; you can charge whatever you like. The GPL simply stipulates tha