Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] file: trunk r89637 - /trunk/main/utils.c

2007-11-27 Thread Simon Perreault
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 12:01:19 SVN commits to the Asterisk project wrote: + long int rm = RAND_MAX; res = res 0 ? ~res : res; - return res; + rm++; + return res % rm; Hum... Won't rm

Re: [asterisk-dev] ast_frame allocation/free question

2007-11-27 Thread Simon Perreault
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 15:11:14 Kevin P. Fleming wrote: This makes no sense; once chan_sip has fed you a frame of audio data, why should it care who frees it, and more importantly, how could it possibly know that the frame is no longer needed? This is getting me very confused. Isn't it

Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] rizzo: tru nk r89452 - in /trunk: acinclude.m4 configu re configure.ac

2007-11-21 Thread Simon Perreault
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 09:57:54 Patrick wrote: Similarly I really don't understand why Asterisk 1.4 requires autoconf 2.60 when that is not supported by the distros mentioned above. One would think this is taken into account. Funny thing is that after ripping out some parts,

Re: [asterisk-dev] install path of asterisk.h

2007-11-20 Thread Simon Perreault
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 12:39:04 Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Is there a real point in keeping asterisk.h outside of the asterisk include directory? It is not a header that saves you the need to include the rest. So there's really no point in just exposing it. Just note that moving it would make

Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] rizzo: tru nk r89452 - in /trunk: acinclude.m4 configure configure.ac

2007-11-20 Thread Simon Perreault
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 13:20:49 Luigi Rizzo wrote: it is actually a big burden. there are 145 different version of each of the tools, some of which are incompatible with each other, and not all build on all platforms. This statement sounds awfully like FUD. What's wrong with autoconf =

Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] rizzo: trunk r89452 - in?/trunk: acinclude.m4 configure configure.ac

2007-11-20 Thread Simon Perreault
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 13:55:45 Luigi Rizzo wrote: pretty much != every. As a matter of fact one of my main boxes has freebsd.4.11 and autoconf is stuck at 2.59 and there are reasons why i need to run asterisk there and i cannot upgrade certain pieces of software or hardware. BTW building

Re: [asterisk-dev] RPM Patches

2007-10-10 Thread Simon Perreault
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 18:25:00 Daniel Hazelbaker wrote: The patches can be found at http://www.blueboxmoon.com/bitweaver/ wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+RPM Unknown host www.blueboxmoon.com Is it me? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] simon.perreault: branch group/v6 r84777 - /team/group/v6/trunk/main/logger.c

2007-10-05 Thread Simon Perreault
On Friday 05 October 2007 10:47:05 SVN commits to the Asterisk project wrote: URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=revrev=84777 Log: Make sure all log messages are out before closing the log thread. Could this please be merged into main if deemed correct? I've been trying to output

Re: [asterisk-dev] watch out usages of AST_LIST_INSERT_TAIL

2007-10-01 Thread Simon Perreault
On Monday 01 October 2007 12:11:38 Luigi Rizzo wrote: i would suggest a simple fix - changing the macro to handle the case of list merging +1 That would make my life easier in at least one particular case. ___ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!

Re: [asterisk-dev] watch out usages of AST_LIST_INSERT_TAIL

2007-10-01 Thread Simon Perreault
On Monday 01 October 2007 13:30:46 Jason Parker wrote: Just a thought, but would it maybe be useful to have something like AST_LIST_COMBINE, to add the contents of list2 to list1? Well, if I understand correctly, the proposed modification would do just that, so AST_LIST_COMBINE would

Re: [asterisk-dev] Forking after threading

2007-09-20 Thread Simon Perreault
On Thursday 20 September 2007 13:33:30 Alexandre Snarskii wrote: *CLI show version Asterisk 1.4.11 built by root @ censored on a i386 running FreeBSD on 2007-09-11 13:37:14 UTC I was talking about the trunk version. The 1.4 branch doesn't contain the ast_event_init() call.

Re: [asterisk-dev] Need Documents of architecture.

2007-09-13 Thread Simon Perreault
On Thursday 13 September 2007 13:57:54 Lokesh Agrawal wrote: I need a help from you. I need detailed (decomposed) architecture and components of Asterisk, And how these components come into picture when a peer to peer call is placed using SIP protocol. Sure, what is your budget? :-)