> > Well, many projects use their -dev lists to actually propose, comment
> > on and hash out new features, so that they don't get put into the
> > "tracking" system until there's a base of support and usually some
> > code behind it. Asterisk is the only project I've ever participated in
> >
> I think a lot of people will agree that -dev is underutilized. My own
> theory is that people stay away because of too many accidental posts
> here (i.e. -users problems). I'm not sure what the solution to that is,
> but that's my opinion.
I can agree with this we need to use -dev more ;)
HAP
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Josh Roberson wrote:
Got any suggestions?
This has probably been the most useful comment of the thread, because it
actually has something to discuss rather than vague generalities.
Well, many projects use their -dev lists to actually propose, comment
on and hash out new
Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
Alright, don't flame me... but, what if something was tried ala MSDN Product
Feedback Center? Anyone can report a bug or feature (after being forced to
search first).
I like this approach so far..
Then, anyone can vote for it (1-5), so the most "important" issues come u
> I know this makes a lot of sense to you Brian, but it's not as 'open' of a
> process as you might think. Personally, I'm glad you can invest a lot of
> time 'in the clubhouse'. I'm sure you've formed a lot of very meaningful
> personal and professional relationships that will enrich your life wit
Darren Nickerson wrote:
I think my point is that _nobody_ will ever manage feature requests in
any concerted way, and that this is OK. There needs to be a way for
someone to 'freshen' an issue if they hang working code on it though,
... because it can become commit-worthy at that point. In the
"Brian West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok guys we work with mark daily and we know what will fly or not fly.
You are indeed all powerful and all knowing, and you have a keen sense of
style too, I might add ;-)
We talk on conf calls NIGHTLY and we communicate VERY fast on bugs and we
don't
just
> I can see your point here, and I agree, most people don't want to do the
> administrative grunt work. I think what needs to happen, since I've seen
> a lot of viewpoints that seem to match yours, is we need more people who's
> specific job is to handle the feature requests then. Would you li
"Josh Roberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can see your point here, and I agree, most people don't want to do the
administrative grunt work. I think what needs to happen, since I've seen
a lot of viewpoints that seem to match yours, is we need more people who's
specific job is to handle the f
hear the story
of where "moose penis" came from :P
bkw
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Nickerson
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 4:56 PM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Su
"Josh Roberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This discussion was actually already here, we just jumped into it. If my
reactions to your viewpoints don't prove that I'm open-minded about this,
I don't know what will.
Aw, I knew you were open minded ;-) You're one of the most level-headed of
the co
Josh Roberson wrote:
I completely agree with this. I wouldn't see a repository for feature
requests/enhancements as a graveyard - meerly another locaiton for
advancement, and our current system as a place where you bring your
bugs, and resolutions to bugs. Perhaps we SHOULD look into a better
"Josh Roberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
A bit of history on this: a few months ago, Mark felt there were too many
bugs open on the bugtracker and threatened to shut down new reports if the
total number were not quickly reduced. I don't remember the exact number,
but 200
On Dec 29, 2004, at 9:50 PM, Brian West wrote:
Ok I think all feature requests need to be gone from
bugs.digium.com... if
it has a patch it should be ok. But feature requests I don't think
should
be on the "bug" tracker. It is a bug tracker right?
So we can focus... what do you think... all ra
Ok I think all feature requests need to be gone from bugs.digium.com... if
it has a patch it should be ok. But feature requests I don't think should
be on the "bug" tracker. It is a bug tracker right?
So we can focus... what do you think... all raise your hands if the bug
tracker should only be
15 matches
Mail list logo
