Daniel Pocock wrote:
People keeping saying the PA168 code is open, but it does not appear
to be true. The only source I have seen available is a small fragment
of the code needed to make a phone. The rest is supplied as compiled
libraries. I'd love to hear it has been fully opened up, but
People keeping saying the PA168 code is open, but it does not appear
to be true. The only source I have seen available is a small fragment
of the code needed to make a phone. The rest is supplied as compiled
libraries. I'd love to hear it has been fully opened up, but so far I
have seen no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Very true.
>
> Too bad that there is no manufacturer interested in producing a non-ghetto
> looking PA168 phone. All I need is some blinkenlighten and softkeys, and
> rest can be managed with software...
How many units you looking at?
It could be cost effective to ma
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, mirza sahib wrote:
> As some one who went down a similar road a year (or is it two now) back
> and learnt a hell of a lot, but didn't get to the final line very well
> (crawling, panting, with bloody knees wasn't the objective) ... I'd also
> recommend you try the PA168 chipse
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Prakash N wrote:
Iam Prakash doing my project in Design and development of Low cost
IP-Phone. Iam planning to use single channel IP phone with minimal
features.
As some one who went down a similar road a year (or is it two now) back
and learnt a hell of a lot, but didn't
