---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/
---
(Updated March 7, 2014, 9:01 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/
---
(Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 12:50 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Feb. 6, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/branches/12/main/format_cap_ng.c, lines 316-320
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/diff/1/?file=53410#file53410line316
Should the call to AST_VECTOR_REMOVE_CMP_ORDERED be outside the list
traversal?
Nope! That macro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 2:59 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
On Feb. 7, 2014, 1:39 a.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/main/codec_builtin.c, lines 358-369
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/diff/1/?file=53407#file53407line358
Is there a
lpc10_lenght()
needed?
These implementations come from what we already have. If any are
On Feb. 5, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/branches/12/include/asterisk/format_cap_ng.h, line 49
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/diff/1/?file=53400#file53400line49
Does ng stand for next generation? If this ends up replacing
format_cap.h, would the ng be dropped
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/#review10821
---
/branches/12/include/asterisk/codec.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/#review10770
---
All of my comments have to do with implementation details as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3178/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
