On 04 Jul 2014, at 14:41, wdoekes wrote:
> And generally there is a period of rest between submitting the review and
> committing the code, so you would normally have been in time for review.
>
I would kindly like to remind everyone about this. Especially if it affects
release versions.
Hav
> On July 4, 2014, 7:48 a.m., Alexander Traud wrote:
> > As I am the contributor of the original patch: Argg, I thought I
> > double-checked all symbols. Anyway, mistakes happen.
> > I am not sure why I wasn’t invited as reviewer for this one here.
> >
> > EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name() is the only
> On July 4, 2014, 7:48 a.m., Alexander Traud wrote:
> > As I am the contributor of the original patch: Argg, I thought I
> > double-checked all symbols. Anyway, mistakes happen.
> > I am not sure why I wasn’t invited as reviewer for this one here.
> >
> > EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name() is the only
> On July 4, 2014, 7:48 a.m., Alexander Traud wrote:
> > As I am the contributor of the original patch: Argg, I thought I
> > double-checked all symbols. Anyway, mistakes happen.
> > I am not sure why I wasn’t invited as reviewer for this one here.
> >
> > EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name() is the only
> On July 4, 2014, 7:48 a.m., Alexander Traud wrote:
> > As I am the contributor of the original patch: Argg, I thought I
> > double-checked all symbols. Anyway, mistakes happen.
> > I am not sure why I wasn’t invited as reviewer for this one here.
> >
> > EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name() is the only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3709/#review12483
---
As I am the contributor of the original patch: Argg, I thought
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3709/
---
(Updated July 3, 2014, 11:55 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3709/#review12475
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On July 3, 2014, 4:36 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3709/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23905
https://i
