---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/
---
(Updated July 25, 2014, 9:27 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/#review12847
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On July 21, 2014, 4:58
On July 21, 2014, 5:49 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/trunk/main/loader.c, lines 1001-1005
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/diff/2/?file=64886#file64886line1001
Feel free to cringe at this suggestion, but since you've created both
an AST_DLLIST_ENTRY and an AST_LIST_ENTRY on
On July 16, 2014, 7:52 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/trunk/main/loader.c, lines 606-607
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/diff/1/?file=63328#file63328line606
Not sure we want this, but if we do I think it should be ast_debug.
It will be useful when debugging ref leaks in the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/
---
(Updated July 21, 2014, 11:58 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/#review12789
---
/trunk/main/loader.c
On July 21, 2014, 12:49 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/trunk/main/loader.c, lines 1001-1005
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/diff/2/?file=64886#file64886line1001
Feel free to cringe at this suggestion, but since you've created both
an AST_DLLIST_ENTRY and an AST_LIST_ENTRY
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/#review12702
---
This file is terrible when it comes to {} around code blocks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3777/
---
(Updated July 14, 2014, 3:16 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
