---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/
---
(Updated Sept. 2, 2014, 1:17 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/#review13188
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/#review13164
---
Review your doxygen because I think you are repeating
On Aug. 25, 2014, 1:12 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
Review your doxygen because I think you are repeating yourself, and also
run through all the PJSIP tests. Do that and this is good to go.
I don't see the doxygen problem. One states that on transaction state changes,
it is called before SDP
On Aug. 25, 2014, 1:12 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
Review your doxygen because I think you are repeating yourself, and also
run through all the PJSIP tests. Do that and this is good to go.
Mark Michelson wrote:
I don't see the doxygen problem. One states that on transaction state
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24212
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/#review13157
---
My only concern with this is that we somehow have code which
On Aug. 24, 2014, 3:56 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
My only concern with this is that we somehow have code which expected to be
invoked at #3 - do you think this is possible at all?
It may also be useful to document your flow discovery above within the code
somewhere for future reference.
On Aug. 24, 2014, 3:56 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
My only concern with this is that we somehow have code which expected to be
invoked at #3 - do you think this is possible at all?
Joshua Colp wrote:
It may also be useful to document your flow discovery above within the
code
On Aug. 24, 2014, 3:56 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
My only concern with this is that we somehow have code which expected to be
invoked at #3 - do you think this is possible at all?
Joshua Colp wrote:
It may also be useful to document your flow discovery above within the
code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3930/
---
(Updated Aug. 24, 2014, 11:37 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
11 matches
Mail list logo
