On Thursday 04 September 2014 11:07:33 David M. Lee wrote:
> I don’t have DAHDI support enabled; the Makefile installs it
> regardless. I’ll update the patch to only install the script if DAHDI
> support is enabled, then.
+1
> I have to say that it seems like a bad behavior to install anything
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3972/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2014, 1:33 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
On Sep 3, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
> So I don't see a way which would achieve what you want -- i.e: install
> as a regular user *and* with DAHDI support. OTOH, build+install of
> asterisk *without* DAHDI support should not have this problem (otherwise
> it's a bug which should be fixe
> On Sept. 4, 2014, 10:49 a.m., Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Short version: not needed, IMO.
> >
> > The path was hard-coded in the first place because the DAHDI udev hooks
> > directory is explicitly hard-coded. Placing it elsewhere does nothing. If
> > the prefix is anything other than '/usr'. t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3972/#review13229
---
Short version: not needed, IMO.
The path was hard-coded in the
Hi,
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 13:57:11 David Lee wrote:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3972/
> ---
> ...
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3972/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
Description
