Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-18 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/ --- (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 8:20 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/#review13334 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On Sept. 15, 2014, 10:46 a.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-16 Thread opticron
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:37 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote: > > The relationship between the native, local, and remote types is not clear. > > This could cause confusion in the reader trying to understand the types. > > Although there is a hierarchy in the underlying document format, this is >

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-16 Thread opticron
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:32 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: > > The place that needs the most improvement is Multi-party - Mixing: > > - MeetMe is _not_ more performant (ever). The description also doesn't > > tell a user what MeetMe actually is: a conference bridge for multiple > > channels. > > -

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-16 Thread Scott Griepentrog
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/#review13314 --- The relationship between the native, local, and remote types is

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-16 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/#review13313 --- The place that needs the most improvement is Multi-party - Mixi

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3994: Bridges User Documentation Update

2014-09-15 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-23469 None De